In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Particularly, progress means to be successful by implementing certain ideas or views of people around them. In general, implementation of a certain process or ideas require harmony among people who have common thought. It is always not true that progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting point of views as it somehow create hindrance for further development. Thus, I mostly believe progress requires discussion among people who have mutual thought in common.
Firstly, the progress in fields like construction, research and development requires discussion among people who have common ideology regarding development. For instance- to minimize traffic in the cities, the mayor decided to build a flyover to surpass the vehicle so that there is less congested in cities road. The advocates of that plan study the feasibility of the construction, its cost estimation and finally how the flyover really solve the problem of the congestion of traffic. Whereas, the opponent of that plan argue its structure distorts the foundation of the surface weakening the geographical structure.
Secondly, adversity group always criticize the projects and create hindrance in the development of project. For instance- in defaming government the opponent group always criticize the action taken by the ruling party in developing the cities like managing disposals, proper sanitation, dispatching health services etc. To make less popular in governance, the opponent party always excoriate the ruling government project either it is viable in purpose of the cities or its population creating hindrance in the development of the cities.
Thirdly, some people having negative intention always want to topple the system making negative environment inside the working firms. For example- some of the employees in the firm who are antagonize with the managers always want to defame manager by blocking his path or actions taken by the manager in proper regulating the firms by showing only negative impacts of that action and making other employee demotivated even if the action is for the well-being of the staffs.
However, some of the contrasting views shows positive effects in the development. For example- while developing new medicine to treat disease in effective way, some critics present negative effects in human beings while testing the medicines saving millions of dollar through prohibiting of the productions of that medicine. Either, it will help research team to discuss further and changing in the chemical compositions and making the medicine suitable for further uses.
In conclusion, progress particularly derive from the harmony of group having common thoughts and it is always not true, some of the contrasting views regarding develop helps to analyze the process and helps to mollify from the effects of that process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e problem of the congestion of traffic. Whereas, the opponent of that plan argue its st...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...inside the working firms. For example- some of the employees in the firm who are antagoniz...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...mple- some of the employees in the firm who are antagonize with the managers always wan...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'antagonized'.
Suggestion: antagonized
...me of the employees in the firm who are antagonize with the managers always want to defame...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...he well-being of the staffs. However, some of the contrasting views shows positive effect...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 121, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...mon thoughts and it is always not true, some of the contrasting views regarding develop hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2409.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84017622487 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495433789954 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2385030771 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.705882353 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7647058824 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5882352941 5.21951772744 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181776786112 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721859939944 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822182812146 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926491969113 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846789567689 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.