To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Moral is the fitting of proper behavior of the people in comparison with some agreeable unstated or written social rules that operate within those people’s area. When some people adhere to these rules, let say outsiders from another area, the inhabitants of the area will pay back the respect to these people coming from different cities or nations. The morality and ethics of a certain group of people is uniquely made depending on the culture, the environment, and other factors that attribute for the formation of the social rules. Any leader that wants to be heard or followed must also follow the rules as this leader is also a part of the society. Effective leaderships will result in a good outcome and success for the leader, and it requires adequate to strong support from the people. Thus, obeying the ethics and morals of the people is one of the first keys in gaining success for the leaders.
Public official is the legal leader of a specific area of jurisdiction in a administrative area, and ideally people will vote for a person who has high quality of morals and ethics and it becomes a nature that is inherent as a social response from the people. Nobody, of course, wishes somebody that is problematic, rude, and disrespectful as their leader. When this is the case, people will think that that leader is not worthy for any respect at all; they will not follow or support any program from that kind of leader, and it will be difficult from them to reach the goals. Moreover, if the situation is people are deciding on choosing which candidate will be the right person for the position, then the people who are morally wrong will not have any chance to be selected. Corruptive senators, abusive mayors, or lazy and unproductive ministers will gain contempt from their people in an ideal society whose the citizens are well educated and well mannered. These erroneous leaders can not make an effective impact for the people in the end, and when they create any mistake that becomes well known, it will be hard for them to clear their name and regain trust from the people.
Persuading the people to follow any objection or new program provided by the public officials is a hard task to do. Many people come from different segment of the overall society, and sometimes each segment has different opinion on the matters of ethics, morals, or a broader topic like a new idea of change. For example, New York can be divided into several communities based on religion, ethnicities, and the nation that their ancestors came from years ago. When a city official designs some new programs for the city, this person must persuade all communities that are affected by the new programs. When they can not achieve an agreement or they are not receiving a significant support from all the communities, it will be hard for them to implement the new measures. The leaders of the people must understand and know really well each group of their society to deliver an effective governance. Although those leaders are not a part of a particular group, they still must acknowledge these people’s views. This is why becoming a good leader is really hard when we want to make a change within a diverse society, and the first thing to do is respecting all the morals and ethics of the people and trying not to violate or hurt any of those values.
Another exception can be made when the society of the people is not well established. Sometimes, some areas are naturally unlawful and full of brute. For instance, many area that have high number of crimes are difficult to manage due to violent nature of the people. Even though the leaders already show the right side of morality, it would be difficult for them to make a change. Another example is when there are some places that are newly built that do not yet have any formed moral and ethics. In this area, maybe it will be much easier to manage because people are new to this place and it will be much more flexible to make a change to a place that is still in the development. Nevertheless, all leaders, regardless of the people, must be the prime example for their people in morality and ethics. With this statement in mind, it will be a good start for any public official who wants to make a great positive impact for the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r of a specific area of jurisdiction in a administrative area, and ideally people...
^
Line 3, column 908, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...t from their people in an ideal society whose the citizens are well educated and well...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'many areas'.
Suggestion: many areas
...lawful and full of brute. For instance, many area that have high number of crimes are dif...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 28.0 11.3162921348 247% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3540.0 2235.4752809 158% => OK
No of words: 756.0 442.535393258 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68253968254 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.24361079503 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45829267539 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.406084656085 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1130.4 704.065955056 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 11.0 1.77640449438 619% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1514935026 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1591663279 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549594157805 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349333029813 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115080135112 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014066479068 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 100.480337079 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.