To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Ethics and morality is almost same terminology, but still there is difference between them. Morality is personal and normative perception of a person, and ethics is the standards to distinguish between bad and good. The prompt states that to be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. I mostly agree with the statements because of two reasons.
Firstly, it is mandatory for an effective leader to maintain the highest ethical standards. The term ethics means the standards to differentiate the qualities of good and bad in a community or in a society. Is it possible for a leader to lead the society without maintaining the standards of good and bad of that society? The answer is obviously no. For example, in a society, taking venality is prohibited, but a person argue that venality will not be prohibited in some cases. This type argument make that person an apostate. Some people of the society may support him, but most of the people will not support that person. If the people does not support a person, it will be impossible for that person to lead the society. The example illustrates us that to maintain ethical standards is mandatory for public officials to be an effective leader.
Secondly, morality means a personal and normative perception of good and bad. Highest standard of morality is also very much necessary for a person to be an effective leader. For example, in a society, there is no such rule about environmental pollution. People in that community are careless about their wastage management and environment. A public official finds that the people action about the environment is detrimental for the community and he try to regulate a new rule about the environmental pollution. Without any doubt, this type of step taken by that person will be beneficial for the society and after some days, people will appreciate the official. The example shows us that high standard of morality of a public official aid to regulate some new standards of good and bad, which will ultimately improve the society. Thus, to maintain a highest standard of morality is also a requirement to be an effective leader.
However, morality and ethics sometimes may contradicts with each other. For example, in a community, most of the people are religious, but a public official is an atheist. In his moral of view, religion is bad for a society. His point of view may be justifiable, but this type of behavior may alienate the people in the community, and may cause serious conflict with in the society. A competent leader should not take any step that causes conflict. Therefore, sometimes maintaining a highest standard of morality may not support a person to be an effective leader.
In conclusion, ethics and morality sometimes will contradict each other; however, it is clear now that to be an effective leader, one must need to have the highest ethical and moral standards. Therefore, to be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Highest'.
Suggestion: The Highest
...d normative perception of good and bad. Highest standard of morality is also very much ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 451, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...is detrimental for the community and he try to regulate a new rule about the enviro...
^^^
Line 6, column 850, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... improve the society. Thus, to maintain a highest standard of morality is also a ...
^
Line 8, column 483, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...flict. Therefore, sometimes maintaining a highest standard of morality may not su...
^
Line 10, column 36, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put between 'will' and 'contradict'.
Suggestion: will sometimes contradict
.... In conclusion, ethics and morality sometimes will contradict each other; however, it is clear now th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2554.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00784313725 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83656034427 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.354901960784 0.4932671777 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 826.2 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9250465493 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0689655172 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5862068966 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55172413793 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.567547527689 0.243740707755 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194115106723 0.0831039109588 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.227114489993 0.0758088955206 300% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.425976710648 0.150359130593 283% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134706772739 0.0667264976115 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.