There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Human being can never live alone. Every species is important in the ecosystem of this world, and every species is interrelated to each other. The prompt states that there is little justification for society to make extraordinary effort to save endangered animal or plant species- especially at a great cost in money and jobs. I strongly disagree with the statement and argue that humans should make extraordinary effort to save endangered species for their own betterment. My stand is based on two reasons.
Firstly, at the present situation of the world, different activities of humans are responsible for the extinction of the other species. For example, the habitat of the wild life is decreasing day by day due to fulfilling the need of the increasing population. We can take account of Royal Bangle Tiger. Royal Bangle is one of the indigenous species of the world largest mangrove forest Shundarban. Due the extensive increase of the population in Bangladesh, where the Shundarban is situated, the area of the Shundarban is decreasing, so the habitat of the tiger is also decreasing. The surprising result is that the total amount of the Royal Bangle tiger is only 250 and this number is also decreasing day by day as native people frequently killing tiger for their safety. So to maintain the increasing human population the habitat of the wild life is decreasing, which is the major cause for the species extinction in some part of the world. Thus, human should find a way to preserve those species, as they are directly responsible for the extinction.
Secondly, the advancement of the industry and technology is responsible for the decreasing of the species. For example, the advancement of nuclear science. We know that the radiation emitted by the radioactive materials used in nuclear power plant is deleterious for the living being. It is observed that the many plant species around a nuclear power plant, which were used to grow before establishment of the power plant, are not growing any more. Not only nuclear power plant, we all know the detrimental effects of the effluents released by the chemical industries, textile industries. The plastics that we are using disturb the normal habitat of the ocean life. Last year in Australia due to forest fire about 50000 animal died and thousand acre of forest burned, and this frequent forest fire is only due to the temperature rising in the world. This temperature rising is also effect of industrialization. Hence, the advancement of the technology and industry is responsible for declining of many animal and plant species.
In conclusion, it is clear that humans are responsible for the decrease of the species. Therefore, human being should take extraordinary efforts in term of costs and jobs to save the endangered species, as it is not possible for human to live alone in the planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
Human being can never live alone. Every species is important in the ecosystem o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...forest fire about 50000 animal died and thousand acre of forest burned, and this frequen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04641350211 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.889623871 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445147679325 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7968093579 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329509824685 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876820575388 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164343280757 0.0737576698707 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22809151458 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184144940598 0.0645574589148 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.