The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them sense of cooperation, not competition.
The speaker contends that the optimum way to prepare the young generation for leadership in various fields is to make them understand the value of cooperation instead of competition. I concede that cooperation in young people can create synergy in their learning progress and they can also learn from each other. In some respect, however, competition is essential to find out who is going to lead the group.
Admittedly, working in a group makes it easier for young generation to create synergy in their work. It gives them idea about what they excel at and therefore, work towards it. Cooperation in young teaches them that working in a team yields more output than working as an individual. To illustrate, we have seen many donation campaings done by the youth. They are extremly enthusiastic towards the work through cooperation. Together, they are able to reach any extremes because they know they have each other in their backup. Thus, working together in a group makes youth more energetic and self-reliant towards their task which is an essential skill required by the youth for leadership.
Moreover, cooperation is the best way to learn from each other and to be a leader, it is essential to respect everyone's knowledge. When students work in a group they have a sense of sharing knowledge with each other which makes them confident in themselves and well as know about others making them aware about wide range of perspective. For instance, in a science class, a project is assigned to a group member who posses divergent interest within science. Say, one has interest in physics, another has interest in botany , another in goology and so on. When they work in a group the young one who is proficient in physics can share his knowledge and so can other youth in their expertise. This sense of sharing knowledge boosts their confidence as well and make them a efficient leader.
However, the speaker ignores that the sense of competition in youth makees them better in their work and therefore be a better leader. Since there is only one who can handle everyone in a group, the sense of competition is essential to find out who that person is in a group.
In sum, the statement correctly statesthat the cooperation is essential for youth as it can help in building confidence to work in team and therefore synergy in their work. However, the statement overlooks students the sense of competition in youth can make them better in leadership because there is only one leader to help in cooperation. Therefore, both cooperation and competition in youth is essential for leadership quality developement.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udes that allocating a greater amount of the companys budget to advertising will ...
^^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e conclusion. Initial problem with the authors argument is the possible assumption tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s assumption. Another problem with the authors argument is that the scenario about pas...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun audiences is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ases, financial crisis which is causing less audiences to watch movies. Even though,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Author
...conclusion made by the author. Lastly. author does not give clear evidence about the ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...certainly misrepresenting the scenario. Thus the conlcusion is made on incomplete ev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... evidences, the loopholes remain in the authors argument and therefore, author conclusi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21265822785 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6247976246 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498734177215 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0637849511 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.368421053 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0500320639569 0.243740707755 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171918122512 0.0831039109588 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191813210857 0.0758088955206 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0322839992873 0.150359130593 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251400393363 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udes that allocating a greater amount of the companys budget to advertising will ...
^^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e conclusion. Initial problem with the authors argument is the possible assumption tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s assumption. Another problem with the authors argument is that the scenario about pas...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun audiences is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ases, financial crisis which is causing less audiences to watch movies. Even though,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Author
...conclusion made by the author. Lastly. author does not give clear evidence about the ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...certainly misrepresenting the scenario. Thus the conlcusion is made on incomplete ev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... evidences, the loopholes remain in the authors argument and therefore, author conclusi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21265822785 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6247976246 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498734177215 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0637849511 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.368421053 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0500320639569 0.243740707755 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171918122512 0.0831039109588 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191813210857 0.0758088955206 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0322839992873 0.150359130593 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251400393363 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.