The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
It is a matter of the common knowledge that the modern society relies heavily on the cooperation and competition on both individual and organizational level, still, some people argue that preparing the next generation's leaders for cooperation is more important, I disagree and will try to justify my position.
Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the benefits of cooperation. Having a better teamwork can lead to deeper specialization, improved communication, and can help achieve far bigger goals than an individual could on their own. but while a team is most effective when each of the members has a distinct identity and a role, young people need to experience different roles, they need time to develop their character. During the project someone might take role of an engineer, someone of a project manager. While teh result might be good, they'll never experiecne the other side, and might never discover that they are more suited for the other position. Such things are much less likely to happen in a competition.
Secondly, cooperation often means being partially or fully responsible for others' failure, such is much mroe common in young people since they are stilld eveloping the sense of responsibility. which can demotivate high-achieving individuals. Most of us have had that one teammate in a senior project whose unexpected lethargy has caused us dearly. Repeated such occurances can develop a mistrust in the future leader. Therefore, later age is a better time to develop the sense of cooperation, on averange everyone is much more depandable.
People might argue that if the sense of cooperation is not developed at an earlier age, it will be hard for people to work in teams in their adulthood. While the improtance of teamwork in our modern society is unquestionable, it is important to note that forcefully trying to instill cooperation can backfire, making individuals mroe isolated, while nurturing competition might encourage them to work in teams to increase their chances. There are many examples of successful companies created by individuals who joined up to outcompete their peers, such as Google, NurtureAI, and legamus.
In conclusion I would say, that while teamwork is important, the society is better off nurting a sense of competition in the next generation, since it will help them find their identity and will encourage them to discover the need for cooperation on their own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... than an individual could on their own. but while a team is most effective when eac...
^^^
Line 4, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...anager. While teh result might be good, theyll never experiecne the other side, and mi...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... eveloping the sense of responsibility. which can demotivate high-achieving individua...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...eveloping the sense of responsibility. which can demotivate high-achieving individua...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2199488491 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00305637704 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524296675192 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9205324353 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5625 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193264750385 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566540635036 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542479780335 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111854417275 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105824944513 0.0667264976115 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.