The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Among various qualities a human being is bestowed with, the ability to make good decisions is of primal importance. Those individuals who lack this ability are the ones who are often looked down upon. So, everyone is found to have the tendency of making appropriate decisions at every stage of their lives.
Now what makes one a good decision maker or a poor decision maker? Well there are several factors which govern this trait of humans. First of all let it be cleared that a particular individual is not to be labeled as a good or poor decision maker. There are several occasions where s/he is able to make logical decisions and it could be other way round at some other occasions. Same is the case with other human beings. So, let us talk about a particular decision. What makes it good, bolstered with logic, or poor, without any logical ground? The following paragraphs follow this discussion.
Well, as I mentioned earlier that several factors affect the decision making ability of an individual at a particular stage of their life. Among them are the previous knowledge about the subject (on which the decision is to be made), emotional attachment (of the person who has to make a decision) with the subject, expertise on the subject etc. Emotional attachment with the subject happens to be one of the dominating factors. Now, are the decisions based on emotions justifiable with logic or are they merely poor decisions, is a topic which requires thorough analysis.
There are several occasions where the decisions based on emotion prove to be right. For example,one might consider the case of a person having favourable career prospects in a foreign country, but at his homeland, he has his ailing parents who don't have anyone except their son to look after. If this individual is emotionally connected with his parents he will of course skip the opportunity to go foreign for a job with decent salary. This decision, although disadvantageous monetarily, is rewarding for the person’s emotionality for he will have the privilege of enjoying the warm company of his parents.
But on several occasions decisions based on emotion prove to be wrong.
Summarily I would like to state that it is
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , one
...n emotion prove to be right. For example,one might consider the case of a person ha...
^^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r example,one might consider the case of a person having favourable career prospe...
^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...homeland, he has his ailing parents who dont have anyone except their son to look af...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, well, as to, for example, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92493297587 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71786403748 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512064343164 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4652125866 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4761904762 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7619047619 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0538086865585 0.243740707755 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0165618925212 0.0831039109588 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300543036544 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0221364811046 0.150359130593 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306723673654 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.