The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Leadership quality among the youth needs to be honed in order to have a society prospering and maintaining a sustainable development. This can be done in several ways - be it through cooperation or competition. Both have its merits and demerits, however, as an educator and a leader (in many aspects) myself, I have realized that cooperation is the better key deal to achieving the qualities of a leader. Thus, whichever field someone is aiming for to become a leader in, he/she definitely feed his sense of cooperation more than the sense of competition.
To begin with an example - the Trump administration has probably seen one of the most resignations from its seniors compared to previous presidential administrations. Barack Obama, on the other hand, was very popular within his administration. The key difference between these two is very clear on the stages and in the interviews - Obama is more cooperative and facilitating compared to Trump who is by far has done only what he thinks or believes is right. This is a perfect example for the youth, I believe, to show them how cooperation from the early stages of their lives can shape them to be a leader who is accepted wholeheartedly. When you are cooperative, be default you show empathy towards your associates, which many times enables them to open-up with you even at a personal level - this definitely will help you immensely to have a better grasp of your associates and bring out the best of them, yielding in a productive environment. I, as an educator, have often found this to be true when one my students will come up to me and share his personal problems to explain his poor grades, and after I consult him and cooperate with him to work things out, many a times I have the grades improved for that student.
Furthermore, as can be seen from the corporate world, where competition is rising every single second, the best way these big companies win these competitions is by making teams - you have marketing teams, sales teams, advertising teams, etc. So if you are not a team player, you will hardly survive to even participate in that competition. In fact, you need to be a team-player first before you get into the competition and lead the market. In the present world, as the current tend suggests, in order to climb the ladder, you must be the guy who can work in an environment with full of team spirit.
However, there is no doubt that competition has its own role as well molding someone into a leader. Competition often helps a person push that extra mile required to be in the leadership position. If you do not have the slightest of competition within your thoughts, you probably would not be able to showcase your leadership skills.
Cooperation or competition, both are required for leadership, but both have their own weights on the output, and definitely they are not equal. Cooperation to me has the higher percentage of weight and the difference is quite significant. Thus, in order to bring the best of leadership from the youth, they should be entrenched with cooperation more rather than competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1172, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...erate with him to work things out, many a times I have the grades improved for that stu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus, well, in fact, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84716981132 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92401575077 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.784324093 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.45 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141110631735 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046531416743 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427849078233 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859638105408 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447437750277 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.