Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Whole of our education system is primarily based on creating experts in different fields of study. This is with the aim so that people can concentrate on a particular area and provide more comprehensive solutions and suggestions to present world problems; this cannot be expected from someone not so proficient in the field. It is tantamount to ignorance to have received any sort of critical judgment in any given field from someone who has little or no expertise in the field.
In medical science, until the students choose their major, they pretty much have common core courses, and thus all the doctors have some sort of knowledge outside their major. However, you will never find an oncologist making decisions, or even giving suggestions in the eye department of a hospital. The plain reason being, he/she knows that his/her expertise is not in the field and it is only ethical not to interfere; he/she realizes the ramifications of him/her making decisions outside his expertise. That was just an example, but is true for any given field.
At least the previous example was based on a person who is somewhat relevant to the field – medical – but how about someone who does not even fall in the domain of hospitals? Often we come around people who tend to prescribe medicines to others based on their own experience – “I had the same symptoms and the doctor gave me these antibiotics. I think you should try them as well.” Sounds familiar? We are surrounded by such dilettantes and many a times without even realizing the consequences accept whatever is being said. The “expert” probably do not even realize that every individual has different physiology and therefore the doctor may not have prescribed antibiotics – in fact doctors nowadays prefer avoiding antibiotics for the patients given its negative impacts on the body.
However, it would be a wrong assumption that whenever we identify someone as an expert, does not mean he/she is a “know-it-all” guy; rather there can be issues he/she may not be aware of even within the field of his/her expertise. This often is realized in engineering fields, and more specifically power plants – a PhD holder who developed the high-efficient evaporator, when asked to find out the recently figured problem, will probably crunch on serious calculus to solve the issue, whereas, all it takes is a stroke of hammer to fix it. The diploma engineer who was standing by - even though not an expert in evaporator designs with his experience working with similar machines – knew the solution all along.
There is no doubt of the need of expertise to make any important decisions in any given field. An inexpert decision, although may carry some weight, most often will result in counterproductive consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...surrounded by such dilettantes and many a times without even realizing the consequences...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e as an expert, does not mean he/she is a 'know-it-all' guy; rather the...
^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is often
...in the field of his/her expertise. This often is realized in engineering fields, and mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'will' and 'result'.
Suggestion: will often result
...n, although may carry some weight, most often will result in counterproductive consequences.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, at least, i think, in fact, no doubt, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2346.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06695464363 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9440854219 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565874730022 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.767632118 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2352941176 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318555631051 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102817459668 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120604868719 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178969785947 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104093757421 0.0667264976115 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.