The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
It is debatable whether young people for leadership should instill to cooperate or to compete. I agree with the argument, which means that young leaders should cooperate with each other rather than compete.
Granted, competing leadership is effective sometimes; especially in case of simple and easy work. For example, to find the solution of simple technological solution in industry, the leader may open a contest to find the appropriate solution for that. This may effective because the effort need in the work is not significant, and even can be handled by one person. Thus, because the competing attitude is important sometimes, it can be thought that the young leaders should be instilled by the competing attitude.
However, cooperating leadership is effective usually; especially in case of complicated and hard work. To illustrate, let's think about the next step after the aforementioned contest. The technological problem is solved via contest, and that solution should be adapted into the whole system. Since there is possibly lots of problems in step of adapting the solution, cooperation of each technological parts is inevitable. Even in the case suggested as the example for the good point of competing attitude, it need to be cooperative after the solving of the problem. Therefore, young leaders are better to have cooperative attitude.
In addition, cooperating leadership is useful even in case of the government. The work in government is like a mixing bowl of all social problems. That problems are so complicated and connected each other, that it cannot be solved by the effort of single person. To deal with that problems, not only in between persons, but also in between the department should cooperate each other to solve the encountered problems. If each department compete each other, then they will start to focus on the victory against other department, not the suggesting of successful solution for the social problem. Thus, this example bolster the opinion that the young leaders should have the cooperative attitude.
In brief, of course there can be other ways instead of cooperation or competition. However, in between the cooperation and competition, I think that the cooperation is the far better posture for the raising young leaders following to the aforementioned reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in brief, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95474291116 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4161637535 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.75 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173714495592 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600822059201 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628880376481 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118816011852 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466874010627 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.