The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense a cooperation, not competition.
The given prompt states that for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation and not competition. On one hand, cooperation helps in the exchange of ideas and detection of potential flaws that may incur while implementing those ideas whereas, on the other hand, a tough competition may push the boundaries of an individual making him achieve higher success. This is thus a contentious issue and needs scrupulous analysis to reach any conclusion. However, I strongly agree that cooperation will definitely prepare young generations in developing their skills and leadership qualities.
To begin with, cooperation involves a variety of different minds working together on the same project or idea figuring a way to either improve or implement (or both) that. Consequently, they are able to learn stuff from each other including leadership qualities. Consider a small situation of a university student. For completing a project at hand, the student has two choices viz completing it all by himself in the given deadline or work in a team of 4-5 peers and engage collectively to make the project even better. If he prefers the first option, he might end up either not being able to submit it on deadline because of the complexity of university level projects of will take much stress will do only to complete it by the deadline. In fact, his main approach would be to be able to complete the project before the deadline. Instead, if the students work collectively they not only be able to complete the project on time but will also learn stuff from each other. Hence, it is crucial that young generations learn to work in a collaborative environment which benefits the whole group.
Furthermore, having a sense of cooperation, especially on the part of a leader, will instill trust in others who are part of a group. This will in turn help in earning teammate's cooperation. The leader will not only acquire skills like management and reviewing, in depth, each and every idea pitched in by the members. He or she will even be able to absorb the constructive criticism he might recieve for sharing a potential idea. Consequently, the flaws in the idea will be easily recognized and could be amended considering all possible case scenarios. This further strengthens a sense of cooperation.
However, one must never forget the importance of competition in pushing an individual. There is no better motivation than transgressing your competition. People will really try harder and harder, coming up with new ideas, implementing them with each and every functionality etc. They will feel, what in modern slang, is called "FOMO" (Fear of missing out). In fact, many executives of the firm are using this method to their advantage to spread their products, services etc. This also means that an individual, looking at the attempts of their competitors, will hence strive to surpass them and will in turn benefit the society to a huge extent.
Even though, there are some advantages of competition, there are various noxious disadvantages as well. Competition might persuade an individual to think in a criminal sense. He or she would want to clear the tracks and want to demolish others whereras in cooperation this might no be the case. The individual will prove to be beneficial for the society and mark the upcoming of new potential leaders. Thus, instilling a sense of cooperation is far more beneficial than competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stuff'
Suggestion: to stuff
...t. Consequently, they are able to learn stuff from each other including leadership qu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 948, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stuff'
Suggestion: to stuff
...the project on time but will also learn stuff from each other. Hence, it is crucial t...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 280, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...hers whereras in cooperation this might no be the case. The individual will prove ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, really, so, still, then, thus, well, whereas, while, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2945.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 583.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05145797599 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9674228378 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499142367067 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 917.1 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5196068647 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.551724138 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1034482759 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86206896552 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23428649918 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599560471472 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119261485966 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14503873765 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130058645434 0.0667264976115 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.