The statement indicates that praising the positive action and ignoring the negative action of students can help them learn better. Admittedly the praises from teachers are powerful to push the students study more active, whereas the ignorance of all the negative action of students may be seen as the acquiesce and tolerance of such action. When it comes to this question, I always recommend that we need to divide the situation and consider more inclusively.
Praises can make sense. When a kid gets a praise from his parents, he may be more jovial than enjoy the sugars. And so as to the students, when they have been extolled by the teachers, they will feel more prided, which give them the idea that they can handle with all the troubles. So when the next challenge comes, they can manage it more actively and confidently. Edison, who was the most famous inventor, may suit for this case. When others misunderstood his interest in invention and derided him, only his mother supported and acclaimed him, which accelerated the pace for Edison to invent the light bulb. From his experience, we can get a obvious conclusion that the praises are conductive for the students.
Though we must praise the positive action of students, we cannot ignore all the negative action actually. It's easily thought that the ignorance might mean that the teachers and parents stomach the negative action of the students who could make the same mistake. Some may be worry about that the kids will be frustrated when others point out his faults or criticize them, but in only the words of censure are germane and acceptable, kids could receive the words and realize their faults. Hence, the appropriate criticism can also help the students.
In sum, when we choose the best way of teaching students, the praises of their positive action is indispensable, while the negative action we could not ignore but to pay attention to it and push students to correct. Combining the praises and the criticism, the students can have a more all-encompassed view of themselves and preform better in ant area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... action of students can help them learn better. Admittedly the praises from teachers a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ative action of students may be seen as the acquiesce and tolerance of such action. When it c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... more jovial than enjoy the sugars. And so as to the students, when they have been extol...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t bulb. From his experience, we can get a obvious conclusion that the praises are...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, may, so, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92613636364 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56057173973 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514204545455 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4715962454 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289858292212 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103668273609 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137348672931 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217417189041 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117220323242 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.