“The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I partly agree with the claim that it is the best way to teach others with praising psitive actions while ignoring their negative ones. To prase and igonore actions might be effective in different circumstances.
Granted, prasing positive actions of someone is the best way when the someone is defident person , has potential capacity, who has failed to show great achievement. It is very important for people to be confident, this is because people who was praised by others are more likley to achieve the goal faster and greater than they judged themselves. I saw a study which assess oldsters physical activity levels compared two results between before and after commend about their physical age. the oldsters are more likely to show their results greater when they exercise after the positive words about their physical age. It shows that praise the positive things encourage people to trescend their potential capcity they have.
Despite the great effect of the positive reaction to things, ignoring negative actions might hamper people from developing their selves by revise their falut or problem. When it comes to train athletics with weight training, it is very important for trainers to check their wrong position while athletics’ exercise. If trainer ignore their problamatic actions or moves in order not to disturb their feeling, athletics might get very serious injure by not improve their adverse movements in weight training. Thus, it is very important for people to check their negative actions to iimprove their selves.
In summary, I partly agree with the claim because of the reasons I mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: the; someone
...actions of someone is the best way when the someone is defident person , has potential capa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... way when the someone is defident person , has potential capacity, who has failed ...
^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...after commend about their physical age. the oldsters are more likely to show their ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 262.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24809160305 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48588375371 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 704.065955056 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8544434227 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185225340476 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788880916154 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059968696218 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126408286003 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502296557134 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.