The given topic is highly contentious because different people may have disparate opinions on the given topic. One may go for the topic while others cannot embrace it at all. I believed that as far as I am concerned I am dissonant with the topic. I cannot agree with the topic; however, it is to praise positive actions. We cannot deny the fact that the negative action is to be encountered.
Positive activity will surely praise one’s attitude of thinking. The first school of a child is their home and their first teacher is their parents. It is a prime duty of parents to take care of and, provide better skills and knowledge to their children. Parents should not forget to praise the positive work of their children. The teachers in school also need to praise students kind behaviour and, positive work. In addition, a teacher should inspire them for positively achieving their dream.
In contrast, if a child is seen helping their friend and doing similar activities, they should be rewarded with good gestures that might motivate them to be better in future. Small things that we ignore can bring a lot of changes in child behaviour. In such instance, if a child is seen quarrelling and some negative behaviour, we must teach a child what is wrong and right. A child may find difficulty in dealing with a few things. In such instances, it will be us who should take care of the situation and show the right path. These activities help them to elucidate between vacillating decisions.
However, appraising the positive actions one must not forget to correct negative actions. There might be some venial mistakes that could be forgiven. Not every mistake can be cured by punishment, some mistakes can be handled with proper care and affection too. These activities motivate children not to repeat the same mistakes in future.
Thus, as a whole, the best way to teach a child is to praise positive work and correct the mistakes committed by them. This method will surely help to make a better judgement in the future and better person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s that might motivate them to be better in future. Small things that we ignore can bring ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hildren not to repeat the same mistakes in future. Thus, as a whole, the best way to te...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79320113314 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51703184036 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501416430595 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0715171703 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5652173913 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.347826087 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13043478261 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151284444077 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510540932826 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053530145353 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084246497857 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256555793676 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.