Trusting the hands on the wheel is always a controversial issue for many people. Regarding this topic, for the most part I also agree that a healthy amount of skepticism is vital since it keeps leaders accountable to those they serve but the purpose of it varies in business, education and government.
Clearly, the process of attaining leadership in the three mentioned sector differ characteristically. In a democratic system, political leaders are chosen by direct or indirect popular after pertinent screening and vetting procedures vote thus we must have necessarily attain at least a paucity of trust in the candidate before we select them hold the office. Due to the corruptible nature of governing, we consequently withhold the right to be cynic of the political leaders and scrutinize their actions lest they turn into tyrants. For example in a country like North Korea, the ruling group have deemed themselves to have transcended beyond the need to being held in check; as a result they have turn into despicable oppressors who flaunt their unchecked power in the face of their emaciated nation. Whereas their southern neighbor South Korea, has flourished by keeping the government body accountable and transparent.
In a business or educational environment however, the leader is not elected by the body of employees or the students but by a board of directors or a committee. Additionally, in cases such as corporations the CEO may also be an outsider element not a former employee who has risen through the rank. With that in mind, the initial doubt in the leader is inherent human nature and well-founded, but it in indispensable not to allow this mistrust turn into a schism that clunks the working system since that will detrimental to any leader’s capability, however adroit, to guide properly.
All thing considered, it is considering the amount of time needed for the fledgling leader’s decisions to take effect is paramount; we must not rush into biased hastily disparagement of the steps taken and let the nascent results fully emerges into the light.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'attained'.
Suggestion: attained
...ures vote thus we must have necessarily attain at least a paucity of trust in the cand...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 699, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'turned'.
Suggestion: turned
...ng held in check; as a result they have turn into despicable oppressors who flaunt t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 923, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment body accountable and transparent. In a business or educational environment...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, at least, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12352941176 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98161030318 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614705882353 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6571281051 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.363636364 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9090909091 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 5.21951772744 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141366757497 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519433539715 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428621705234 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862557938028 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451293882012 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.