the chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in the history. Do you agree or disagree?
The author of the issue highlights that the major benefit of the study of the history is that people can become familiar with differences in different periods. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that with the study of the history nothing could jeopardize our welfare and it helps us not to make same mistakes as our predecessors did. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, the history is our best teacher owing to the fact that it contains loads of useful information that any generation could rely on and take the advantage of a study of the history. Broadly speaking, information provided by history can provide fertile ground for people or a nation to gain a conspicuous success. As a palpable example, happenings in the war are really informative and the government could refer to the history of wars to find out what were the causes and effects of the previous wars and stop a new war from arising. By studying the history, not only can a society get informed of unpredictable events in near future but also can fortify the infrastructure of the country. To elucidate more on this issue, hardly can any nation achieve success without the study of the history due to the fact that history helps us not be gullible toward any event.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that study of the history could help us realize development and improvement during different generations. If we take a minute to ponder over it, vast majorities of countries suffered from the paucity of technology like the internet, public transportation, education and so forth. But, history will allow us to discern how these technologies have taken place and penetrated every single facet of our lives since previous generations. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that study of the history not only can improve and enhance our well-being but also can patronize the society to make a progress day in day out.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all context. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, a study of the history might have nothing to do with people's lives. Although the history is an inseparable part of our lives, refer to the history might not be effective enough to give a hand to people to confront obstacles. Arguably, human beings have to think about their future lives and make a sound decision and a plan, not to do something wrong in their future lives. That being so, a study of the history and neglect the future might be the sheer waste of time. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all context. Alon...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, really, so, well, broadly speaking
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2474.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82261208577 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78461386516 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506822612086 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8903942954 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.7 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.65 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189980868783 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577434313242 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052540547439 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911253246918 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498820458637 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.