Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Leadership can be defined as how an organization is governed under the authority of a certain set of people who follow an identified methodology for a body to govern. Different types of leadership can rule or manifest the company in their ways. Any type of organization requires a renovation after a certain time because it is necessary to change the norms as they could be easily affected by shortcomings such as corruption. Therefore, I am in the support of the claim that in any field be it business, political, or education, people who have the authority to run these should step down after a certain time.
Firstly, the presidential rule in the United States of America is run by the notion that the party which is in power would rule out after five years. If the citizens of the country adore the president then they can elect the same president only two times consecutively, after that the person can not run for the president. To justify my statement one of the best examples is the ex-president of the country Barack Obama. Citizens elected him twice and he did change and presented a country with different schemes that could help the people be it rich or poor or from mediocre family. These steps brought the good ramifications for his party and he was again become the president of the country. But if he would remain president for a longer time then it could create a problem for his own country.
Secondly, the education system which is followed in India is the same as it was at the time when the country was under British colonization. The British people introduced the industrialization mechanism for education so that students could only prepare themselves to work subservient to the British empire only. Even after independence, the education system has not been changed due to which it has raised so many issues. In the twenty-first century where creativity and overall performance are the needs of the world, the students in the country are still preparing themselves to be work under someone else. Therefore, it shows that revitalization is necessary for fields like education too.
Moreover, this practice has also its downside such as if an enterprise which is power had started something to change its association or the company and its duration of five years is completed then it is almost negligible that the next person whosoever will be in power will give attention to detail to whatever the previous leader was required to do. However, if the leader was corrupt then it can turn out to be a boon for a company that their new leader can lead the company to the path of success.
Lastly, I would like to end my note by focusing on the point that even though the claim might have its shortcomings but it also has its advantages that are successfully
ruling out the disadvantages. Henceforth, the path of success can be lead if the leadership is revitalized after a certain period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80914512922 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83059225756 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469184890656 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.905095765 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.315789474 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4736842105 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216840503378 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649760699641 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532235474425 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104741524916 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449766380184 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.