Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The writer contend that, in field such as politics, educaation, government--those in power should step down or resign after five years; the correct path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. I am partially agree with the auther accertion, in my view sole way to resign is not only responsible for the successful indicator of that field. In the eye's of the history, Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincon, Bill Gates they are considered as successful leader and world still remember their need and deed in the present and futer and forever, however, Saddam Hussan, King Ganendra, George W. Boosh is also good leader in their time, latter replaced by Barack Obema, Giriga Prasad Koirala.
As we saw the example of the Nelson Mendala, he is considered as a great philintrophist, revolutionary: considered as a hero of the leader. He lead South Africa from 1993-1999 as his persidencies, indeed people of not only South Africa praise his leadership, all over the world seeking his absence in the revitalization of goverment. In his case resign is not considered good but, surest path for success is his leadership. However, Suddham Husan is another leader of Ireque, he is misantrophist, kill thousand of the inoccent child, women and other people of the Ireque and America, in case of such leader step down is the surest path for the successed enterprise, government, policies etc.
Additionally, in case of the business, Bill is the greatest person. His marketing policies, decisions, broke the brass tracks in this fields.
In conclusion, step down is one way to solve the problem of the field, but resign is not always good for revitalization of enterprise through new leadership.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contends'.
Suggestion: contends
The writer contend that, in field such as politics, educaa...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... through new leadership. I am partially agree with the auther accertion, in my view s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'leads'.
Suggestion: leads
... considered as a hero of the leader. He lead South Africa from 1993-1999 as his pers...
^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the surest'.
Suggestion: , the surest
...s case resign is not considered good but, surest path for success is his leadership. How...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...er of Ireque, he is misantrophist, kill thousand of the inoccent child, women and other ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s, decisions, broke the brass tracks in this fields. In conclusion, step down is ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'so', 'still', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my view']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.313846153846 0.240241500013 131% => OK
Verbs: 0.104615384615 0.157235817809 67% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0707692307692 0.0880659088768 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492307692308 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0461538461538 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135384615385 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0184615384615 0.0406280797675 45% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.01777049749 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00923076923077 0.030933414821 30% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00615384615385 0.0016655270985 369% => OK
Determiners: 0.0892307692308 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00307692307692 0.0249443105267 12% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0148568991511 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1712.0 2732.02544248 63% => OK
No of words: 280.0 452.878318584 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11428571429 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.58838876751 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382142857143 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257142857143 0.280924506359 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185714285714 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135714285714 0.132149295362 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01777049749 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567857142857 0.48968727796 116% => OK
Word variations: 58.8807403003 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6194690265 48% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.380412469 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.7164261062 59.4972553346 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.2 141.124799967 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.380412469 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.674092028746 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 53.7142857143 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.33846153846 1.64882698954 142% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396439286675 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155251035984 0.123202303941 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0704999206637 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.661621060178 0.547984918172 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144963836456 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204951135087 0.161403998019 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169900516208 0.0892212321368 190% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.362476719067 0.385218514788 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0845824133404 0.0692045440612 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277291832416 0.275328986314 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096353516518 0.0653680567796 147% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 13.5995575221 44% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.