Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Based on the assumption that revitalization through leadership is inherent for any enterprise to succeed, the author maintains that those in power should step down after five years. I would qualify the view put forth though, as different situations call for eclectic kinds of leadership. What might be considered long-time governance in some fields, is insufficient for others. Assaying individually all the scenarios would best settle the dichotomy.
In "An answer to the question : What is Enlightenment?" Kant pinpoints how much laziness is peculiar to human being, whose consequences translate into a need for the majority to be incessantly stimulated. Otherwise, people tend to rest on their laurels. The cognizance of their assignment being time-bound might, as much as expected outcomes, urge leaders and ruling parties to readily and aptly undertake actions. In regard to the philosopher's stance, revitalization is a stimulus for these fields to be properly fed and run.
Such an exposure presents a double impact, since it acts as a deterrent for those who had envisaged leading for personal interests or at worst, restrain in time their field of action. Especially in politics, long tenure causes the leaders to grow increasingly autocratic in the way the address public issues. Right from Lenine back in early times to Alassane Ouatara today, many instances embody the fact that long-lasting regimes all too often slide into the realm of dictatorship. In being intrepid towards reshuffle or accountability, politicians might misuse their authority while in power.
This characteristic also applies to business and old companies denoting a smell of monarchy due to the power being transferred from parents to children. Mistakenly are the same interests and sakes preserved, and handed over from one generation to another, resulting in a hindrance to actual success. Their resignation would thus be the catalyst for an efficient operation.
However changes in leadership might act as a discontinuation of certain policies and procedures, central to the success of an organization. Educational institutions, for instance, necessitate to gradually stage the implementation of curriculum or the incorporation of tools such as new technologies, the impact of which might hardly be ascertained in half a decade. Long-time experience is a prerequisite in these assignments' longevity, and any change would only be akin to a loss of valuable expertise.
The aforementioned claim also ignores enterprises that sheerly burgeon with a strong leadership, working on behalf of workers. Time shouldn't be the main yardstick of rulers' substitution when an organisation progresses and evolves along a continuum. Had Bill Gates been forced out of the power of his company, Microsoft would not have been such a successful organisation. These instances incline us to believe that even if those in power lack inspiration or are stifled by hurdles, revitalization isn't always the surest path to success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'philosophers'' or 'philosopher's'?
Suggestion: philosophers'; philosopher's
...tly undertake actions. In regard to the philosophers stance, revitalization is a stimulus fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...catalyst for an efficient operation. However changes in leadership might act as a di...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 415, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'assignments'' or 'assignment's'?
Suggestion: assignments'; assignment's
...e experience is a prerequisite in these assignments longevity, and any change would only be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...hip, working on behalf of workers. Time shouldnt be the main yardstick of rulers substit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 497, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... are stifled by hurdles, revitalization isnt always the surest path to success.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51187904968 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27909323405 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637149028078 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8848041246 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0454545455 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246348900406 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060451652468 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890098499268 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116600110007 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845468251716 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 100.480337079 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.