Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The issue that the author mentioned on the letter is acceptable but partially unconvincing for me, because of several cases about science and history.
Firstly, In case of science, especially in astronomy, I agree with the author’s statement that much of the information which people had believed is actually not truth that people have to question the information. The geocentric theory, once refered as a solid theory that explain the universe, is now turned out to be false because of the heliocentric theory of Copernicus. It was most presentative theory stating the center of the universe is the Earth. Conversely, Copernicus announced the heliocenteric theory which states the center of the universe, which is called solar system, is the Sun, not the Earth. The theory of Copernicus was mor credible than the initial one that contemproraries which were astronomist, started to accept the new theory which was paradigm shift for them.
Secondly, when it comes to history facts, I believe that information should be trusted, since the dates and the times would not change whether it was recorded at past or not. This is because the exact time of the accidents are not vulnerable that they happened once and only. It is too reckless to tell people from acknowledge information for the reason that the information was made in the past.
In summary, I partially agree with the author’s argument about mistrust on the information that is outdated. On the otherhand, I disagree with the author’s statement since there are some reasons that I mentioned above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18359375 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94795088641 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1510698701 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.636363636 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196169408614 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685511069282 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601345548069 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951011053689 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067081366756 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.