Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future. Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. Write a response in which you d

Essay topics:

Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.

Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

The issue that the author mentioned on the letter is acceptable but partially unconvincing for me, because of several cases about science and history.

Firstly, In case of science, especially in astronomy, I agree with the author’s statement that much of the information which people had believed is actually not truth that people have to question the information. The geocentric theory, once refered as a solid theory that explain the universe, is now turned out to be false because of the heliocentric theory of Copernicus. It was most presentative theory stating the center of the universe is the Earth. Conversely, Copernicus announced the heliocenteric theory which states the center of the universe, which is called solar system, is the Sun, not the Earth. The theory of Copernicus was mor credible than the initial one that contemproraries which were astronomist, started to accept the new theory which was paradigm shift for them.

There is one more example of deep ocean fishes that would advocate my statement. Until the announcement of Christiana who was professor of zoology, the theory of Edward Forbes was primary that states there will be no creature under water depth below 1800ft. That hasty conclusion was based on the observation that marine lives declined as explorer went down deeper, However, there are more than 1,300 species of deep ocean fishes that live under 1800ft.

When it comes to history facts, I believe that information should be trusted, since the dates and the times would not change whether it was recorded at past or not. This is because the exact time of the accidents are not vulnerable that they happened once and only. It is too reckless to tell people from acknowledge information for the reason that the information was made in the past.

Lastly, an example of science, Newton’s law of universal gravitation led me to disagree with the author’s agreement. The law of universal gravitation states that every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force which is directly proportional to the product of their masses. It is a physical law that has been refered as a established fact that there is no theory that can replace the law.

In summary, I believe that we should accept information more deliberately, since there are many information that contemporaries cannot judge whether it is fact or not, except of historical record.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ep ocean fishes that live under 1800ft. When it comes to history facts, I belie...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 357, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a physical law that has been refered as a established fact that there is no theor...
^
Line 11, column 93, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...tion more deliberately, since there are many information that contemporaries cannot ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 93, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...tion more deliberately, since there are many information that contemporaries cannot judge whethe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14430379747 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86396146559 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529113924051 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5257923272 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184687513055 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568727571169 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612150930099 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856225940364 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674465480288 0.0667264976115 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.