claim: The best part of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing opinion.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend against the doubts and contrasting vies of others does one can really discover the value of that idea.
Write a response in which you discuss extent you agree with the claim and reason on which claim is based
While convincing others in an argument, people endeavour to figure out logical soundness of their viewpoint and use these logical reasons to defend themselves. To exemplify, quite often scientists debate on an issue with their co-members even if they are not very sure about the facts involving in the issue and in process of adding value to their opinions they learn facts prevailing and increase their awareness about an issue. But, often while involving in an argument through critical thinking people end up by identifying fallacious logics in their viewpoint. At such instances instead of defending themselves, they should admit that others viewpoint is correct. For example once my friend argued with me that TOEFL examination fee was INR 12,240 assuming that 1US dollar = 68 INR, but then after googling she realised that 1US dollar = 68.80 INR and agreed that TOEFL examination fee was INR 12,383.10.
Sometimes, by being forced to defend ourselves in an argument we tend to believe wrong logics. In arrogance, we become devoid of intelligence and instead of sticking to optimal solution of an argument we tend to undermine others if they are logically correct. We may not even realise that we are wrong. For example we see often that, in some arguments, politicians become morose and rebuke their opponents even if they didn’t fulfil promises claimed in their agenda.
In certain arguments even after discovering the value of our idea, we cannot convince others even if our logic is lucid, in such situations we need to mollify others at first and then convey our idea. For example in process of realising appropriateness of a theorem, I argued with my teacher in a disrespectful manner and then even after my logic seemed to be true, my teacher was unable to admit it. Afterwards when I asked her to excuse me, for my arrogant behaviour, she was very kind and even appreciated me for being sceptical.
To conclude, in my view, an optimist and intelligent should judge his viewpoint through critical thinking before involving in an argument and then he/she can just convey his/her reasons to stick to a viewpoint. Then, if others doesn’t agree a healthy argument can be made. Best part of an argument is identifying fallacious logics that lead to a viewpoint but not to blame that someone is wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 640, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ding themselves, they should admit that others viewpoint is correct. For example once ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a disrespectful manner" with adverb for "disrespectful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... of a theorem, I argued with my teacher in a disrespectful manner and then even after my logic seemed to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Best'.
Suggestion: The Best
...t agree a healthy argument can be made. Best part of an argument is identifying fall...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not to blame that someone is wrong.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, while, for example, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02331606218 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75108433776 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510362694301 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5127809664 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.266666667 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219184871239 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845387147537 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583861547352 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137086234621 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435790843094 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.