Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
In the age of digitalization every thing has become more available to the commen people and had made easier for these people to gather knowlege regarding any thing and give their opinion on it. Wrting blogs or their opinion on the political subject significantly increased the understand of poltics in various ways. It might contain some flaws which may effect the quality of political discourse, but at what what cost to the people who are voting for their leader.
When the information regarding to poltices is easyly available for the voter to make opinion regarding the current political situaions there is a less use of covering news in past ways which might be ineffective in today's digital world. For instance, a voter is in a situation where he needs to decide to whom to vote. This voter would most probably go to particular blig where he get detailed information regarding the leader he is planning to vote for. But this process is not always to be true.
Some of the bloggers who are uploading their opinion on political situation will not always be unbiased to a particular political party or a the leader he is voting for. For example, a blogger who is a admirer of a particular leader would only write the pros for that leader and would might not write the cons of that leader. If a person reading his blog would most likly to support that leader, But in real case he might be a corrupt. It can be said that the information presented by the bloggers are not always to be true.
The news coverd by old methods Tv programs and news papers might have a good effect on the people who are not effercted by digitalization. For example a old person who is leaving away from the city where there is no internet facilty but there is only a Tv or an newpaper, then that old person would feel convenient in reading and following through these sources only. But the information provided by these sources can not be trusted completly, these sources also are biased to some leaders.
It can be concluded that these changes in political discourse has some adavantages and disadentages too. But in the digital age it would be good if we tend to get the accurate and un biased information from any methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...ese people to gather knowlege regarding any thing and give their opinion on it. Wrting bl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...litical subject significantly increased the understand of poltics in various ways. It might co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
.... It might contain some flaws which may effect the quality of political discourse, but...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: what
... quality of political discourse, but at what what cost to the people who are voting for t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...probably go to particular blig where he get detailed information regarding the lead...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...is process is not always to be true. Some of the bloggers who are uploading their opinio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...ased to a particular political party or a the leader he is voting for. For example, a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ting for. For example, a blogger who is a admirer of a particular leader would on...
^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...at leader, But in real case he might be a corrupt. It can be said that the information pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ffercted by digitalization. For example a old person who is leaving away from the...
^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ernet facilty but there is only a Tv or an newpaper, then that old person would fe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, then, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65306122449 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60154056816 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451530612245 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0974051224 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158180878813 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594583323772 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627220180371 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925321988495 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308117208496 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.