Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Its been said that "two heads are always better than one head everywhere". Presuming the above quote and the reason on which the author daims so, I disagree with the author's claim that the emergence of the online "blogosphere" has reduced the quality of political discourse in United States.
Considering the quote in the above paragraph, if anyone can publish the political opinions easily then people will come to know about the newa from various angles. The perception of seeing a particular thing is different for different person. A person covering the political news is telling the people on the basis of his understanding whihc might vary from other people. This will not aware the residents properly. Consider the example, A mathematical problem can be solved by different person in different ways which will eventually help the others to get to know the different methods of solving the problem. Drawing the same analogy here, its advantageous to have different opinions on a particular news.
One more major factor to be considered is time. A person near to the place can cover the news instantly and post in on the online blogosphere which will aware the residents in minimal time. Therefore, disagreeing with the author's claim, the emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly bolstered the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 691, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'particular news'.
Suggestion: particular news
...antageous to have different opinions on a particular news. One more major factor to be conside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236434108527 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.15503875969 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0891472868217 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0503875968992 0.0497285424764 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.015503875969 0.0444667217837 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112403100775 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0542635658915 0.0406280797675 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.25757516168 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0232558139535 0.030933414821 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.135658914729 0.0997080785238 136% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.031007751938 0.0249443105267 124% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116279069767 0.0148568991511 78% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1402.0 2732.02544248 51% => OK
No of words: 223.0 452.878318584 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.2869955157 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.58838876751 84% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.381165919283 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286995515695 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201793721973 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.170403587444 0.132149295362 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25757516168 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 219.290929204 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560538116592 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 53.1667084759 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2727272727 23.380412469 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4201086177 59.4972553346 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 141.124799967 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 23.380412469 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.363636363636 0.674092028746 54% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 48.9722788422 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.82456140351 1.64882698954 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.627030654424 0.391690518653 160% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13864775569 0.123202303941 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0833375365733 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.579837692861 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.199228414601 0.149214159877 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.271962214481 0.161403998019 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.200789013792 0.0892212321368 225% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.466627443463 0.385218514788 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0762213077625 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.511564991287 0.275328986314 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728508923739 0.0653680567796 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 13.5995575221 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.