Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The reason that a nations cultural traditions are preserved and genereated in cities does not necessarily reach the conclusion that governments should provide major cities financial support they need. The reason and the claim on which the claim is based is seriously flawed. Hence, I do not agree with it at all.
Firstly, major cities are already thriving without the extra help from the goevernment. Most metropolitan cities have developed businesses,factories along with highly developed infrastructure. Moreover, when tourist from overseas visit a nation, the priority to metropolitan cities is given. The implication is major cities already have enough sources of income that they can manage the city without external financial help from the govenrment. For example, the city of Mumbai, a major city in India, forms upto 25 percent of nations GDP. Now the question one must ask is, does this city, and cities like this one, really need the financial help from government? Any person with reasonable logic would reply nagatively.
Secondly, the reason for the claim is dubious. Quite the contrary to what it states, most of the nation's tradition and cultural heritage is preserved in nation's countriside and not in the cities. For example, major cities in India depend upon service industry as a primary source of income whereas many villages are still agrerian and depend upon traditional sources of income, such as handloom and various arts. Moreover, cuisine of a nation, which is also a part of nations heritage, is best preserved in the countryside as compared to cities, where cuisine is heavily loaded with all sorts of preservatives. The examples above illustrate that countryside and not the major cities help preserve the nations cultural traditions.
Building upon the last example of how villages help preserve cultural traditions, many times, because they are overlooked by the government, residents of these parts of the nation change their traditional businesses such as business of making handmade ornaments due to the lack of funding and support. The point is that many cherished traditions are dying. Should the government provide financial help to such rare family businesses, they are sure to grow. In this way not only a cherished cultural tradition is preseved but also a rare form art is helped to survive.
In conclusion, governments should rather focus on countryside and other small towns rather than major cities becuase they are more likely to preserve cultural traditions and heritage. Financial help from government will definitely help small cities and towns; which in turn will help government itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
The reason that a nations cultural traditions are preserved and g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , factories
...politan cities have developed businesses,factories along with highly developed infrastruct...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...contrary to what it states, most of the nations tradition and cultural heritage is pres...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32935560859 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81304176251 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503579952267 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.9244877653 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397008959869 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121777969989 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843983247477 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243852951327 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081741337099 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.