Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they
need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim
and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author demanding from the government to ensure the financial support of the major cities. This demand priority for the cities where the cultural traditions are granted. This demand is poorly supported, as not promising reasons are stated by the author. However the cultural traditions are important to be saved and used to attract more tourists to a city. The following paragraphs show a discussion about the author’s demand weak reasoning.
The author assumed that cultural traditions are the most promising filed for economic growth of the major cities. For example, there are many cities all over the world and even whole countries where are not depending on the toursism and traditions for their economic growth, such as Germany where the industry is the miain economic growth factor, arabian gulf countries where their economic is based on petroleum industry.
Furthermore, major cities economic need to be based on various promising fields such as industry and agriculture. To demonstrate the government should invest in more than a filed which success is granted, not only tourism field.
On the other hand, there are many cities all over the world that depends on tourism.for instance, Luxor city, where the Egyptian economic gets a powerful push from the tourism income. Some other governments working on improving their traditional historical cities tourism, for example turkey. Turkey government spreading a low priced advanced programs to attract more tourists and enhance their economy.
Finally to conclude the demand evaluation, the government shoud invest their money in the promising fields for the economic growth, which would be promising based on evidence and stuies. The author needs to show more evidence proofing how much financing the cultural traditions would enhance the cities economic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ising reasons are stated by the author. However the cultural traditions are important t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he world and even whole countries where are not depending on the toursism and traditions for thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
... improving their traditional historical cities tourism, for example turkey. Turkey gov...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... tourists and enhance their economy. Finally to conclude the demand evaluation, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 145, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ds for the economic growth, which would be promising based on evidence and stuies. The autho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, so, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 284.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45422535211 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6286832634 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6167507577 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202021842121 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841195909476 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467440961152 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119128476631 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291830496358 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.