The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the
recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples
shape your position.
The argument is on the article written by Dr. Karp , an anthropologist and his study
and the new plan to study the same in the tertia region.Dr.Karp has written an article
on Children in Tertia and about the culture.
The arguement is that they have not mention the type of intreview and the type of
questions of the interviwes.They haven’t indicate the education level in the children
and the background of the children. What are all the things the team is going to
observe and study on the child rearing tradition is not clearly mention.
The team is going to study and correlate the tradition with the other island culture
but there is a possibility of different environment of other island or differnt biological
parents. The resource availability on one island is different than the other is also a
possibility . In that situation it is not possible to correlate the culture between to
iceland.
There is a possibility , Dr. Field’s interview time , lacking of infrastructure in the
tartia. There was no developement of schools and other refreshment activity or the
parents may not spent enough time with the children due to various reasons and that
effect to the children , so they might have spend more time talking about their
biological parent.
To support the argument more information about the nature, cultural background
and also the type of infrastructure presence in the area is require, the kind of study
carring out in the study area is require. Which would help to give more support the
argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt is on the article written by Dr. Karp , an anthropologist and his study and th...
^^
Line 2, column 57, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Dr
... to study the same in the tertia region.Dr.Karp has written an article on Childre...
^^
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Karp
... study the same in the tertia region.Dr.Karp has written an article on Children in ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'mentioned'.
Suggestion: mentioned
...e. The arguement is that they have not mention the type of intreview and the type of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...he type of questions of the interviwes.They haven't indicate the education lev...
^^^^
Line 10, column 63, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...availability on one island is different than the other is also a possibility . In t...
^^^^
Line 11, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nt than the other is also a possibility . In that situation it is not possible to...
^^
Line 13, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...een to iceland. There is a possibility , Dr. Field's interview time , lacki...
^^
Line 13, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...bility , Dr. Field's interview time , lacking of infrastructure in the tarti...
^^
Line 16, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reasons and that effect to the children , so they might have spend more time talk...
^^
Line 16, column 45, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ct to the children , so they might have spend more time talking about their biologic...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
... infrastructure presence in the area is require, the kind of study carring out in the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 20, column 34, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...study carring out in the study area is require. Which would help to give more support ...
^^^^^^^
Line 20, column 43, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rring out in the study area is require. Which would help to give more support the ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, kind of, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 255.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10196078431 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9607366547 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 215.323595506 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486274509804 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.929448695 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.1 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.97078651685 362% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0279776041996 0.243740707755 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0123216984349 0.0831039109588 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215119412718 0.0758088955206 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0089814600746 0.150359130593 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177271463337 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.