Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Imagination is valuable asset for people, and experience is also valuable. The claim considers people can imagine freely to establish their core value. However, I agree partially in the claim. In my humble opinion, I believe that imagination and experience are both valuable in different scenario. And in the following paragraph, I will discuss my statements by examples.
First of all, imagination can be valuable in aesthetic workers, such as writer, singer, and architect. Because there is no correct answer in literature, music or even building design. The success of a masterpiece often related to its uniqueness. For instance, Taipei 101 is one of the successful buildings in Taiwan, and it is famous not only for its height, but also nominate for its special outlook. The designer of the Taipei 101, Mr. Bay, came up with its appearance by imaging bamboo, which is a kind of vegetable common used in traditional Chinese new year dinner. Creation with imagination can be appreciated by the public. That is the reason way I agree with the imagination is valuable asset in art.
However, experience is important in the field of science and engineering, because the basic knowledge and fundamental is unchanged in this subject. To elaborate, a successful programmer in company should deliver a stable application its business. And the correctness of coding logic comes from the education and working experience rather than imagination. Furthermore, it is experience make perfection of programming, not imagination.
To sum up, imagination is valuable in art field and experience is valuable in engineering. And based on scenario above mentioned, I only agree half part of the claim.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 270.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29259259259 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09018757671 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2118620041 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.3888888889 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238218176495 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756474054593 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679666787502 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148791228828 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664571763386 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.