Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
It is nowadays almost a platitude that people tend to assess other people's moral values and personal features by means of social and information media. This more often than not results in the delineation of the worst idiosyncracies of anyone, specifically of vips and well-renowed people. This notwithstanding, a certain number of living people of any kind still manages to be deemed heroes: their value goes well beyond media scrutiny.
In our society, everyone finds a way throughout his life to stick to a role, mainly depending on his jobs. Some roles are, undoubtedly, more easily praisable than others, like those of soldiers, firefighers and doctors. It is exactly from these three categories that the most commonly recognized heroes come out. In fact, whenever life savings (like in the case of firefighters and doctors) and personal commitment to a great cause (see soldiers for a nation) are on the board, we feel confortable maintaining that those people are the heroes of our era. Usually, media have nothing relevant to do with them. In fact, there is nothing momentous enough to ruin the image of a life saver and, on the other side, usually media help getting those people sometimes even world-wide known.
On the other hand, media are effectively a danger for anyone's public image. By this view, we cannot refute that social media have a pivotal role in making it deeply hard for heroes to keep their figure free of negative contamination, and many vips and famous people have been ruined by the mechanisms of medias (specifically by social ones). The reasons for me to assert this is that many concrete examples have been evident in the last decade. Trump, Putin, Berlusconi, to name few: they have all been (and are) important and influential governors in their nation (America, Russia, Italy), but they all failed appearing perfect to the eyes of their citizens. As a matter of fact, media found out a plethora of argumetn to question the authority of those men and to contrue their apparent moral perfection. One above all, the scandals in the private life of Berlusconi.
Nontheless, this system does not result in the total absence of heroes in our present life. In fact, true heroes are considered such properly because they cannot be destroyed by media. In 2006 a terrible earthquake in the centre of Italy challenged the administration of the many local governors. A uncountable amount of rulers were ruined by media during that difficult period, as a lot of flaws and holes in their policies and decisions were constantly highlighted by media themselves. The governor of L'Aquila, the city above the focus of the earthquake, though, was sufficiently wise and shrewd as to demonstrate that he was truly trustworthy, giving thorough explanations for every action he did. By means of these actions, his public consideration gradually waxed, and now he is concretely considered a hero. Aligning to this example, it sounds fair to say that, while media do make things difficult for every not morally untouchable person, they also help people showing their best when they are given a chance to.
In conclusion, it is uncontrovertible that media make it way more difficult for anyone to stand out and survive to public scrutiny. However, there is still someone who, mainly thanks to his real value, is still able to be claimed as heroes. In fact, some virtues, like the one of firefighters of soldiers, cannot be besmirched.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 726, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to get' or 'get'.
Suggestion: to get; get
..., on the other side, usually media help getting those people sometimes even world-wide ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...nistration of the many local governors. A uncountable amount of rulers were ruine...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2870.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99130434783 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78137690127 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 308.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535652173913 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 915.3 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2584328406 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146890507259 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412286376175 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354591837109 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859774433287 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262362968377 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.