Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.Write a

Essay topics:

Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

While it is true that politicians and government official understand policy makings much better than most of the citizens, they do not necessarily know the demands of the people, which is an important consideration in decisions. Therefore, the best solutions would be to involve citizens as well as officials in decision making.

The population need to be involved in decision making processes because they are directly affected by the policies, and the politician may not understand their perspectives. For example, a politician who drives to work every day will not understand why citizens who commute by bicycles need bicycle lanes. Because politicians live differently from many citizens, they may no understand the needs of the public. By leaving decision makings exclusively to the politicians and experts, we are ignoring the opinion of those who are most directly affected by the decision, and the decision will most likely not solve the problem it addresses. Input from citizens are needed if the government wants to make an informed decision that address the problem.

However, politicians and experts have to participate in the decision as well, as citizens probably don not understand the system very well, and may make unpractical proposals. The society we live in is very complicated one, where everything is intertwined together. Change made to one aspect will influence may others. A citizen who is not familiar with the way the society functions may make a decision out of good will only to have it backfire. For example, the citizens may propose to build more affordable housing, but he or she most likely don’t know this simple action will affect the housing market, the job market, the tax rate, etc. Policy making is a hard, complicated process, which needs the expertise of politician and government officials. Though politicians and officials do not represents the population the policy is aimed at, they are needed to assess the practicality of the proposal made by citizens.

In conclusion, decisions should be made with input from both the citizens and the politician. The policies are made to address problems faced by the citizens, and without understanding their perspectives, no problems can be solves. The politicians are need because they are ones who best understand how the policy will affect the society, and they need to make sure the decisions made are practical.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'backfires'?
Suggestion: backfires
...cision out of good will only to have it backfire. For example, the citizens may propose ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 800, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'represent'?
Suggestion: represent
...Though politicians and officials do not represents the population the policy is aimed at, ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'it is true']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240184757506 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.180138568129 0.157235817809 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0484988452656 0.0880659088768 55% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0646651270208 0.0497285424764 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0346420323326 0.0444667217837 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0900692840647 0.12292977631 73% => OK
Participles: 0.0369515011547 0.0406280797675 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8908416431 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0277136258661 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.113163972286 0.0997080785238 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0346420323326 0.0249443105267 139% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0254041570439 0.0148568991511 171% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2412.0 2732.02544248 88% => OK
No of words: 388.0 452.878318584 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21649484536 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386597938144 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.327319587629 0.280924506359 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.255154639175 0.200843997647 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162371134021 0.132149295362 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8908416431 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474226804124 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 50.5496461673 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8235294118 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4974939602 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.882352941 141.124799967 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.674092028746 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 55.5554881747 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.31404958678 1.64882698954 80% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294944004102 0.391690518653 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127159755035 0.123202303941 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0575072571645 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.566604477122 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155738111096 0.149214159877 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130438277648 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762851625596 0.0892212321368 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.495175739972 0.385218514788 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0717171974492 0.0692045440612 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229198041475 0.275328986314 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134021117373 0.0653680567796 21% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.