Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate — and, perhaps, even cruel — to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Unemployment or poverty is nowadays one of the most critical issues in the world. People are everyday dying because of poverty as they are unable to afford any food. Unemployment issues are also rising in every country as people are not skilled enough to get a job or start a business. The prompt recommends that instead of funding for arts and other investments government should feed or help their citizens to get a healthy lifestyle. I mostly agree with this statement and argue that government should invest their funds properly because of the following three reasons.
To begin with, due to growth in the population of the countries and heavy dependence on technology like mobile phones, computers and robots, people are spending unnecessary amount of money. Mostly to show-off stuff people are spending huge amounts on unnecessary things and have no money to save. Therefore, in difficult times when they get unemployed people have no money to eat also. People do not have proper knowledge about how to manage a healthy lifestyle so the government instead of funding artistic works should spend their money to educate people properly from their childhood. For instance, they should launch various programs like "Educating India for a better Future" where they teach properly about everything and make the people skilled enough so they can get a job or start a business later in their life. Public resources should be spent properly for the development of the country instead of wasting it on artistic works.
Secondly, the government once in every 2 years should do a market survey with the help of which they can determine how many people are hungry or unemployed. Due to the massive population everyone cannot get a job, so the government should introduce entrepreneurship programs and make people not only to seek jobs but to create jobs. Instead of spending the money in arts, nations should get together and make an outline for the next 10 years how they are going to change their country with the help of proper investments. They should create a budget plan which checks not only the GDP but various funding programs for institutions to develop the country and overall personality of individuals.
Thirdly, as it is quoted "There are always two sides of the same coin". Government basically does its funding in arts or monuments because it attracts tourism from other countries. Every year tourism is a million dollar industry. People from foreign country try to visit countries like India every year for it's natural beauty, beautiful mythological period and weather. Nations make huge boost in their economy due to this and GDP of the country also rises. But in the end all the money that the nation makes should be invested in the better development of the country. On paper a nation could be successful but real success can be determined only by the happiness of the people in that country.
To conclude with, as we have seen both the perspectives it can be said that overall development of the country, employment and health of the individuals is the most important thing. Everyone has the right to have the basic needs. But the government needs money to function so there are no easy answers. Hence, the government should formulate a plan in which there is proper balance between funding in arts and funding for the better future of the individuals in which they are employed and have all their needs fulfilled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'investments'' or 'investment's'?
Suggestion: investments'; investment's
...t instead of funding for arts and other investments government should feed or help their ci...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llowing three reasons. To begin with, due to growth in the population of the c...
^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... unemployed people have no money to eat also. People do not have proper knowledge ab...
^^^^
Line 9, column 512, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs fulfilled" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'fulfilling' or 'to be fulfilled'.
Suggestion: fulfilling; to be fulfilled
...y are employed and have all their needs fulfilled.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yed and have all their needs fulfilled.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2897.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 578.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01211072664 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90322654589 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67504317951 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442906574394 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6208297025 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.423076923 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255575573584 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732144253101 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600295591561 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155624369418 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269595104212 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.