Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Science is a vast subject covering everything related to plants, animals and different phenomenons that happen everyday around us. Nowadays, science means technology. Without the use of technology, we cannot survive. The prompt recommends two different points of view which suggest that with the help of scientific discoveries humans are able to understand the world better, on the other hand, it says that due to science some believe that the world has become infinitely complex. I mostly agree with the first view recommended by the prompt due to the following three reasons.
To begin with, in the mythological period when people didn't know much about science and there were a few scientific discoveries, humans would do all the things in the traditional way without thinking about the underlying causes. Then some people got curious about how particular things function or how a particular phenomenon occurs, after this people began to experiment different things and started discovering new things, this is how scientific discoveries began. For example, Newton was once lying under a tree then an apple fell on his head, so he thought that why does the apple falls down and dos not go up. This is how gravitational force was discovered. Some people could not understand Newton and thought his theory was fake, but in the end it was proved that gravitational force exist and it gave us much better understanding of how the world is around us.
Secondly, nowadays most of the discoveries are related to technology. In this era every human has got a better understanding of the world due to the technological scientific discoveries and they resonate better with each other. Without science we cannot understand the underlying principles of various phenomenons. For instance, Albert Einstein gave us the theory of relativity in which he said that everything we see is relative to each other, it can be different for different people which helped in shaping the perspective of the society and made world a better place. Due to this and many other scientific discoveries today there is tremendous advancement in the world of banking, finance and technology. Humans are building spaceships, satellites and trying to find life on other planets, prime example of this is Elon Musk who has revolutionized the world with his vision.
Thirdly, now there is some confusion also related to scientific discoveries as they say "There are two sides(perspectives) of the same coin". Due to scientific discoveries, science and technology have grown tremendously and because of this some traditional things are affected. For instance, increase dependence on machine learning and artificial intelligence, as they say robots are taking over the world. Everything is getting automated and hence has become very complex for humans as they cannot compete with machines. They are of course better than humans in working environment and people are losing their jobs. Increased dependence on anything is bad, so too much use of technology is also not good for the human race. It can make the world extremely complex.
Therefore, as we have seen, studied and analyzed both perspectives we can infer that everything has its pros and cons, new scientific discoveries are great and help in development of the world but it also makes the world quite complex in some situations. So there are no easy answers, we should take benefits from the evolving technologies and adapt ourselves to face some complexities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... in the mythological period when people didnt know much about science and there were ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...w a particular phenomenon occurs, after this people began to experiment different th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fall'?
Suggestion: fall
..., so he thought that why does the apple falls down and dos not go up. This is how gra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, of course, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2937.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1982300885 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93881214206 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484955752212 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 916.2 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1539903454 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.48 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3443542106 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878081518937 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780911293696 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194578292487 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517931160276 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.