Claim: Though often considered an objective pursuit, learning about the historical past requires creativity.
Reason: Because we can never know the past directly, we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts, documents, and artifacts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based.
Historical past is the time period the present people cannot never visit, so a lot of imagination is required what was it happened before. some people argued that this historical creativity is too fanciful so they do not consider as history which interprets the past with imaginative ideas. Even though there were not enough way to prove the factuality of historical imagination, historical past requires the certain degree of creativity.
Accepting all imagination from historical accounts, documents, and artifacts as a real is unpersuasive. some novels and movies are the result of imagination based on historical facts. For instance, “The name of the rose” by Umberto Echo, which tells what happened in the church of middle age in Europe, was based on the real documents which describes European middle east church. But people mentioned do not accept this kind of novel and movies as a fully historical fact. Because we all know that this is a writer’s imagination. it is hard to prove the factuality of historical imagination, it is hard to that all imagination from historical accounts are valid.
Nevertheless, the reason that it is impossible to know the past directly, certain degree of creativity is essential to evaluating the historical accounts. Most archeological research, from deducing the use of stone age tool to the huge mysterious creature pyramid in Egypt, ask to use the imagination. Without imagination of archeologists, it might be impossible to reason the ancient people’s purpose and behavior. Therefore, certain degree of imagination is flourishing the historical studying in many aspects.
In conclusion, I agree with the argument that understanding the historical past requires creativity. Lacking of way to know the ancient period directly, we only can know the past indirect way with imagination or creativeness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...s required what was it happened before. some people argued that this historical crea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...nd artifacts as a real is unpersuasive. some novels and movies are the result of ima...
^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...at this is a writer's imagination. it is hard to prove the factuality of hist...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42611683849 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20306622031 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508591065292 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9332061066 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.266666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3547353819 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127568023238 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746795396722 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224007383227 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628079804153 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.