Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre
The process of learning is easier and faster to achieve with those whose views are alike than otherwise. People whose views are shareable are likely to succeed. Disagreements are always complicated because they conduct to big issues which are hard to deal with.
First, collegues who work in the same department may likely to learn from each other because they share knowledge. In fact, they may even help each other when dealing with a difficult situation. At university, for example, a professor has many colleges to help him/her. Working part-time teaching and the rest as a consultant he will certainly need to share not only informations but also works with his fellows. And, shiefly in universities, we can find the best minds.
Second, disagreement may arise unpleasant situations. A conversation between a person and his boss can start heating up and turn into a fight. Therefore, it may end up in firing. Besides, disagreements are not welcome in any circunstamces. They always end up in conflicts.
However, contradicts visions are somehow helpful. Since we have two persons, a lawyer and an engineer, and one of them likes to hear from the other one then there is not going to be a conflict. It is right to say that the engineer has a deeply knowledge about science and some lawyers somewhat like to learn about science, then a simply conversation between them will have a happy end.
Finally, the process of learning is faster accomplished by people in the same field than otherwise. It tends to work in harmony when people have the same view, opinions, thoughts. It is much easielly workable with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('deeply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('knowledge') instead of another adjective.
...t is right to say that the engineer has a deeply knowledge about science and some lawyers somewhat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('simply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('conversation') instead of another adjective.
...ewhat like to learn about science, then a simply conversation between them will have a happy end. Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93406593407 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78899184164 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8479377279 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.8947368421 118.986275619 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.3684210526 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198210384059 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563700481286 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494541361052 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104532694306 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624915269325 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 14.1392134831 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.