College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Should students be encouraged to pursue with subjects that interest them or choose to the courses that seems likely to bring about the promising job and profitable career path? From my perspective of view, the personal interest should be taken precedence over the job hunting motivation. However, students who have family financial dilemma should consider the better job prospects into a higher priority. And furthermore students who stick to their interest could also win tremendous economic rewards, as those interest might not be necessary to conflict with market requirement.
To start off, it is beneficial for students to pursue with their interest, as such adherence for the innermost impetus could guarantee their greater achievement in academic. As the academic career path is fraught with obstacles and difficulties, people are easy to block with seemingly impossible mission and thus drop out finally. Under such situation, guys with innermost impetus tend to have more sustainable momentum for persistence with their research or study task. However, those who purely targets at the promising job future, might switch to other direction for the sake of a long term outgrowth. Such phenomenon could be understandable, as the initial idea for them to go ahead with study is to catch up with jobs which reflect the market's trend. In short, if and only if conformation to the requirement springing from the deep heart could give us sufficient energy and pluck facing unexpected difficulties and finally striding out.
Furthermore, behind the idea that courses should be adapted to the prospects of job hunting lies the assumption that people could easily predict which jobs could play dominant and important role in the future market. However, such assumption is potentially problematic. Because the market is really so fickle that none could correctly predict the real trend in the future. Take programming language as example. 5 years ago, C programming language is the dominant in the market and a lot of people gained great amount of profit out of such programming skills. However, just 5 years later, with raising up of java and python, the mania of C in market become jaded. Thus, graduates who make endeavors for C during campus definitely felt disappointed, when facing difficulties to do job hunting.
However, I have to concede that students experiencing family financial quandary should consider a decent job and promising career future as the first priority, when making decision for their target courses. In this case, instead of blindly following with interests, the higher priority is that how to solve with family's economic issue. Thus, students are wise to choose study which couples with promising and potentially profitable career, for the sake of dragging family out of such asperity.
Last, under choices mentioned above, the underlying logic is that the courses brought about market profit should conflict with those relevant with interest of students. However, sometimes such logic might be groundless. Normally, some theoretical disciplines, such as mathematic, physics, computer science theories, are irrelevant with market requirement. However, students could get advanced knowledge and skills out of such disciplines study and actually these capacities could guarantee them not to surpass even in a long time scale. That is why a lot of Wall Street Companies spend extremely high salaries to forage with candidates, who have advanced mathematic analytical skills and complicated artificial intelligent on-hand experiences, as the real experts who master such theories and understand how to apply in practise are really rare. Under such circumstance, we can clearly see interest and job prospect tangle together perfectly.
In summary, students should prefer to choose what allure them for a long run benefit. However, it is reasonable for students with financial difficulties to adjust accordingly and escalate the priority of job hunting purpose. Furthermore, we should not be too frustrated for making difficult single decision out of two, as sometime both of them could be harmonious during our study and work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... assumption is potentially problematic. Because the market is really so fickle that non...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hoose study which couples with promising and potentially profitable career, for t...
^^
Line 17, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...levant with market requirement. However, students could get advanced knowledge an...
^^
Line 17, column 551, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Wall seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of (Wall)'.
Suggestion: a lot of (Wall)
... even in a long time scale. That is why a lot of Wall Street Companies spend extremely high s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, thus, in short, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3527.0 2235.4752809 158% => OK
No of words: 649.0 442.535393258 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4345146379 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04732388556 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8179118016 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 324.0 215.323595506 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499229583975 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 1065.6 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7349376069 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.620689655 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3793103448 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06896551724 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175561745216 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535786241648 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595758144736 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110467130746 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572930979941 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 100.480337079 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.