College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
With the development of higher education, students and their parents have been more and more concerned about the majors to choose for university. Some people believe that it is more important to base on interests when making this decision, while opponents contend that the potential career development ought to be the essential factor because it would be more lucrative to take on jobs in such fields after the student graduates. Yet I would concur with the perspective that the enthusiasm towards a field should be the deterministic rationale in the pursuit of a higher education degree.
To begin with, what inspires people to work hard is normally not what others persuade them into doing, but what they like in the first place. Enthusiasm could precipitate rigorous dedication and great inspirations. Take Steve Jobs as an example, his love towards his design enabled him to stick with the meticulous requirements and hence the success of the Apple products.
Furthermore, higher education should shoulder the responsibility of cultivating social development rather than being profit-oriented. Consider the situation where Every student tries to pursue a curriculum in the most popular area, who will work on the other fundamental fields? Were students encouraged to only concentrate in the accounting area, who would be there to devote themselves to meaningful researches and human development?
Admittedly, some may argue that courses that are career-oriented would be conducive to the future development and life standard of a student. Nevertheless, since the world evolves and market oscillates every second, it is difficult to foresee which industry would thrive and offer more job opportunities when the students need to decide on their curricular path in the first year of university. For instance, before the financial crisis in 2008, students would compete fiercely for admission to business schools, hoping to graduate with one foot set inside the finance industry and work on the wall street. But things changed fast and after the bubble was popped, thousands of business students had their plans and dreams collapsed. Not long after, due to rapid technological development, people have become more predilected to choosing jobs and majors that are related to computer science and engineering. Consequently, suggestions regarding future industry trends could not be reliable enough to try changing the direction of one's future.
Succinctly speaking, concerning all the above-mentioned arguments, my stand on this view is that students should be encouraged and inspired to devote into subjects they feel excited about, rather than simply looking at a possible abundance of job opportunities of some fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1029, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...enough to try changing the direction of ones future. Succinctly speaking, concer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, thus, while, for instance, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47393364929 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99437565664 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590047393365 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0429522777 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.375 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.21951772744 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172038876431 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522894290747 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359130370539 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945812852381 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333647794438 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.