College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
As a whole the statement discusses on whether college students should be encouraged to pursue subjects of their interest. While the rest of the statement provides the alternative of whether they should undertake courses that leads to jobs.
In comparison to the students who aim to acquire jobs and the students who pursue their own subject interest, the likelihood of the success rate of later students seems to be high. Since they are allowed to continue to work on subjects they inspire, they are constantly motivated. For example, the Indian cricketer, Sachin Tendulkar is a prominent cricket player who has scored many centuries for his nation. In this case, it is clear that Sachin became successful only because he was egged to pursue career of his interest.
By permitting and supporting students to take on their own interested subjects, there are exposed to numerous opportunities available in the field of Research and Development and their achievements are indisputable. An another instance would be the students of Stanford University recently discovered a battery that would prevent from blasting when a certain temperature is reached.
Not only limited to the above sanguine opportunities, there are high probability for the foundation of many start-up companies. But it has the high risk of being scotched during recession period and also requires leadership and management skills to flawlessly run the companies. With these issues addressed, the result would not only be fruitful for the career of students but also helps in increasing the nation's economy.
Although, the students of present generation are highly volatile, the interest they are having towards a field currently may more likely collapse with the time. Hence, it is required for the students to be in sync with the technological advancements of their field and keep encouraged and motivated. And also, the excitement and interest of students who undertake courses based on the job opportunities of the course seems to be dwindled at higher rate than the other set of students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'an instance' or 'another instance'.
Suggestion: An instance; Another instance
...nd their achievements are indisputable. An another instance would be the students of Stanford Unive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...udents but also helps in increasing the nations economy. Although, the students of p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27878787879 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89539706268 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542424242424 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9420129155 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22279291387 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809584134375 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748476034606 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131663761247 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797718742483 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.