Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the

Essay topics:

Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

In recent years, the globalization has extended its way to the whole world profoundly. This development of global hodgepodge can be also applied to the university academic learning. Thus, there is a saying that the university should allow every student to have international study in the foreign institutions at least for one semester because it can benefit students from many aspects. From my point of view, a sincere suggestion though it is, it may increase some unnecessary burden for students with financial difficulties. Therefore, it may violate the very original intention.

In the first place, I cannot agree more with the recommendation that university should at least provide the opportunities for those students who are interested in intercultural study to go abroad. As the tendency of global cohesion, there is an increasingly urgent need for the contemporary undergraduates to get knowledge of the multicultural information in order to cater for the further learning or career. Another reason for international study is that it will expand the student’s horizon and promote their culture appetite. Furthermore, it is no deniable that a colorful international study in the foreign countries, sometimes with anecdotes and difficulties overcoming will definitely spice up the mundane campus life and make a significant trace on the life resume, which may be a life fortune. As a result, if possible, going abroad for international study should be supported and be given priority by the university and colleges.

However, by stating that international study is of vital importance does not mean that all the students in the university must have such experience by virtue of that there are many different circumstances. For example, students with financial difficulties may not want to go international study because it will put more pressure on their families. Besides, there is of equal possibility that students focusing on the career-oriented further does not desire to go abroad because it provides no utility for them. Thus, we can see that requiring all the students to spend time and money on foreign study without selection is unpractical and a waste of educational resource.

To better solve this problem, I argue that the university should implement the institution and system and provide the appropriate scholarship in order to make sure that each student's particular circumstance is covered. On the one hand, for those students with excellent academic performance but short of money, the university should offer appropriate scholarship after a series of examination. One the other hand, for those undergraduates both with highly demand and interest in multicultural study and fine economic basis, opportunities as much as possible should be given to. In addition, for those neither supported with money nor interest in international experience, university may not need to require them to go abroad. In one word, whether university should require students to go abroad should rely heavily on the very need of individual students by considering the practical conditions.

To sum up, while it seems like a good idea for university students to go international study by virtue of expanding their eyesight, feeling different studying atmosphere and spicing up campus life, there is no exaggeration to say that not every student should doing so due to the different personal further development and practical family support, which, the university should take into serious consideration. Therefore, to better address this recommendation, it is of profound necessity for university to evaluate different students’ condition in order to make deliberate decisions.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
...ir culture appetite. Furthermore, it is no deniable that a colorful international ...
^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... experience by virtue of that there are many different circumstances. For example, students wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and a waste of educational resource. To better solve this problem, I argue th...
^^
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...nterest in multicultural study and fine economic basis, opportunities as much as possibl...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, in addition, as a result, to sum up, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3130.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48161120841 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24518436048 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481611208406 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1018.8 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3759171006 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.047619048 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1904761905 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296778687226 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948020579436 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618922927364 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179420763946 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027104188838 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 48.8420337079 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.