ommunication plays a significant role in every company, be it a multinational company or a small firm with hundred employees. Efficient communication between employees and higher authorities or between employees is the key to a better management of the teams and their functioning. It is generally thought that such email correspondence should be monitored by the company management in order to ensure that the resources of the company are used frugally. I completely agree with this perspective and believe such monitoring and regulations will only help a company in a positive way.
Firstly, there are various instances when email correspondence is used for personal uses rather than an official purpose. For example, it is very common among employees to discuss trivial matters with their colleagues over email. There are many people I know, who even discusses their lunch plans over official email. Although it is not harmful in literal sense but all these inconsequential email correspondence just adds to the load of the inbox mails, thereby making the systems inefficient. If companies introduce regulations and monitor such communication, I feel it would instill a sense of responsibility among the employees and they would understand the importance of a certain decorum of communication.
Secondly, if the communication is not monitored it makes the company vulnerable to malpractices and lawsuits. To illustrate this, I would cite an example of an employee who is probably granted access to some confidential information regarding his or her team. And, if he is manipulated by some other organization or a third-party client and ends up sharing the information over mail, the company might face serious lawsuits. Hence, if there is a regular monitoring of such conversations over email, people would think twice before giving in to such malpractices.
Nevertheless, monitoring of email correspondence might prove to be an intrusion in privacy as well. For example, the crucial discussions, which generally takes place between higher authority officials, are generally conducted furtively. In case, there is a monitoring team, which ideally has access to every conversation, is itself not trustworthy, the company might face huge losses.
In conclusion, I feel the advantages of monitoring email correspondence in companies outweigh the disadvantages. Thus,it is recommended that every company invest resources to build up an efficient and trustworthy monitoring team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ommunication
ommunication plays a significant role in every compa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...tinational company or a small firm with hundred employees. Efficient communication betw...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 566, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nd regulations will only help a company in a positive way. Firstly, there are various instance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...mpanies outweigh the disadvantages. Thus,it is recommended that every company inves...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, third, thus, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55263157895 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34858882089 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534210526316 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1398676623 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299220528035 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956639609842 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732948137425 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17171046591 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562108796462 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.