Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The amount of company interference that should be involved with employee interaction and inter-personal relationships has been a contentious point of debate for some time now. On the one hand is the sentiment of giving free reign to the employees over what they can do during working hours(as long as they're getting their work done) to potentially create a more friendly and amiable working environment. On the other hand, however is the position that employees need to be monitored and overlooked during office hours, so as to pre-empt a number of problems that can naturally arise if a group of employees is left unchecked. I share the latter sentiment, and believe that employee monitoring will not only reduce the waste of valuable resources like time and system capacity, but also be better for the employees.
The most obvious benefit of introducing a monitoring system to check employee e-mails is that it directly dissuades employees from using their office hours to lounge about. This is directly going to benefit the productivity of any employee and of the entire work-force as a whole. This will also result in better and more timely service provided to customers, resulting in more profit for the company, which is essentially the goal of any company.
Employee inter-personal relations will also be helped if such a system is put in place where people in competing departments, say sales, don't get to use their official email accounts to call out or speak ill of other employees in their department. Monitoring will also forestall any potential lawsuits the company might have to face because one of its sales employees decided it was a good idea to send an email to a client directly lambasting a competing company's product.
While it's natural to assume such a working condition is too harsh for an employee to work in, I believe it's going to help them in the long run. Work should be separated from entertainment and gossip, and implementing such a system works to imbibe this lesson in the workers, not just for office-hours, but one they'll need for life.
Such a system, when correctly implemented, can also be complemented with added breaks/activities for employees, as a reward for increased productivity, which a direct antidote to procrastination, and can help people lead a more well-rounded and fulfilling life.
All in all, I support such a monitoring system as it's going to benefit the company, the customers, and most importantly the employees as well, both personally and professionally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: FREE_REIGN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'free rein'?
Suggestion: free rein
...the one hand is the sentiment of giving free reign to the employees over what they can do ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...y can do during working hoursas long as theyre getting their work done to potentially ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 518, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...red and overlooked during office hours, so as to pre-empt a number of problems that can ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le in competing departments, say sales, dont get to use their official email account...
^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...employees decided it was a good idea to send an email to a client directly lambasting a compe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 105, Rule ID: IT_IS[19]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...h for an employee to work in, I believe its going to help them in the long run. Wor...
^^^
Line 6, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...ers, not just for office-hours, but one theyll need for life. Such a system, when cor...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 51, Rule ID: IT_IS[19]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
..., I support such a monitoring system as its going to benefit the company, the custo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, well, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06730769231 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0364982703 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524038461538 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1684373846 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.153846154 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281403750117 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106594323973 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708600554585 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148140403932 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572345987413 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.