Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The productivity of a company is largely governed by its communication with its clients and the relationship the top management has with its employees. With the advent of instant electronic mails, the ease of communication has improved drastically allowing resources and information being transferred efficiently. However, there have been cases of employees using this mode of communication to send objectionable matter to clients and others which lands a heavy lawsuit to the company since such e-mails are sent from the company email address. Some employees also sell company secrets to rival companies via email which again, bring a heavy loss to the organization. In order to curb such unfortunate events, there has been a suggestion to conduct routine monitoring of e-mail correspondence of all employees by the company management.
Each employee sends out hundreds of e-mails every day. In a large organization, the e-mail traffic can easily amount to the order of thousands of e-mails sent everyday. It will not be practically feasible to monitor each and every email being sent and recieved by each employee. Such a policy would consume enormous amount of time of the management and compromise their productivity.
If their e-mails were to be intercepted, the employees would object to their breach of privacy. There might be employees who send emails to their personal contacts such as family and friends between the working hours. They would highly object to their personal e-mails being read by all of the management. Employees who are faithful to the company might be offended by this routine and this would lead to discontent between the top management and the employees.
It may also be the case that some officials may be biased towards a particular employee and may frame it wrongly. Employees are also assigned individual tasks where they need to correspond to the clients while sharing secrets that not all of the company management is aware of. If there is some discreet deal being made, checking all e-mails will be detrimental to the company.
The company can use the time and resources efficiently by installing software in the company computer network which can detect objectionable matter being sent. Such software uses certain keywords to detect the wrong kind of e-mail and then warns the management of a particular employee. Using an impartial judge to weed out the company rats will save the time of the company management and will also keep the employees contented.
Hence, the company management should not check all the correspondence emails of the employees and only focus on those employees who are suspected of being at a fault and use an electronic medium to do so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... the order of thousands of e-mails sent everyday. It will not be practically feasible to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...to their personal e-mails being read by all of the management. Employees who are faithful ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... clients while sharing secrets that not all of the company management is aware of. If ther...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, then, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19090909091 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87657969537 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452272727273 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2487266879 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332571125531 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108163330565 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714884196324 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176210155495 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642541776596 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.