Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Companies employ various techniques and plans in order to improve employee productivity and also to reduce the waste of resources, and such plans are also important for growth of a company, but a company need to ensure that in a process of doing so and employing such plans it does not limit the freedom of employees. If employees of a company feel that they are not given enough freedom or the company is controlling them too much it will limit their productivity and willingness to work. Therefore, i completely disagree with the statement that a company management should conduct routine monitoring of all e-mail correspondence to reduce waste of resources, as well as protect the company from lawsuit.
Let us take example of Facebook or google office enviorment or any modern product base company. In Facebook office employees are given freedom to work and also many extracurricular activities that they can enjoy while working and even such companies also allow their employees to work from home. Such a practice helps the employee to be creative and enjoy their work which in turn results in increased productivity and also the employees look forward to work. A regular routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence will make employees of company feel that they are being spied and also will feel that the company is limiting their freedom and hence will not enjoy their work and this will ultimately leads to decrease in productivity of a employee.
Another example is japan where almost every company conduct routine monitoring of of all employee e-mail correspondence and it also delivers some result as japan is one of the fastest devoloping country and people of japan are known for their hard work. But doing so puts an enormous work related preasure on employees and also leads to depression and that is why japan has a high rate of work preasure related suicide and increasing cases of depression among employees.
Concluding my essay i would say that in order to reduce wateg of resources and to increase the productivity of employees companies need to make employee enjoy their work encourage them to be creative by giving them some freedom and not the other way around.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 713, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...joy their work and this will ultimately leads to decrease in productivity of a employ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 750, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ly leads to decrease in productivity of a employee. Another example is japan...
^
Line 9, column 80, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...very company conduct routine monitoring of of all employee e-mail correspondence and ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 21, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ong employees. Concluding my essay i would say that in order to reduce wateg...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01630434783 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7601633811 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445652173913 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2490316131 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.6 118.986275619 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.8 23.4991977007 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329807322015 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150187604413 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123921770262 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207290381507 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119525043651 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 14.1392134831 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.