Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Scientific research's plays most immpoertant roles in our lives, from technology to health care everything can be and is improving day by day through a large number of scientific research's. While a large number of these research's produce a unclear result that does not mean that thease results are not immportant and are waste of money, infact most of the impeccable inventions in technology and pharmacuticals are resulted from multiple failed experiments. Although there are many researches that have been funded does not have any productive intentions and sometimes these researchers only intention is scamming government's money. Thus, Government should not stop funding researchs whose consequences are unclear but should also implicate some regulations so that only fair researcher's should get funded government.
In 2006, an indian doctor invented a device which can detect cancer cells in very early stages, it took the doctor more than 300 experiments and over 9 years to finally devlope the device but he was constantly supported by government funding and insted of multiple failed experiments. What if the government had stopped funding this research after 10 or 20 failed experiments? many lives which are saved by this device by detecting early cancer cells would have been lost.
Yes, offcourse there are many researchers who have no clear intent to produce something productive and many wants to scam government's money this will lead to waste of alot of government's fund. Therefore government should also devlope some regulations and set of rules to make sure that researcher's intend is good and even if the research would produce unclear result it will somehow will help in future. this will only allow to save some fund which could help to fund some other researches.
in essance, i strongly disagree with the statement that Government should not fund research whose consequences are unclear but government should also not fund researches without imlicating any regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom technology to health care everything can be and is improving day by day throu...
^^
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... be and is improving day by day through a large number of scientific researchs. While a large num...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e number of scientific researchs. While a large number of these researchs produce a unclear resul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...large number of these researchs produce a unclear result that does not mean that ...
^
Line 1, column 758, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t should also implicate some regulations so that only fair researchers should get...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overnment funding and insted of multiple failed experiments. What if the governme...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...arch after 10 or 20 failed experiments? many lives which are saved by this device by...
^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arly cancer cells would have been lost. Yes, offcourse there are many researcher...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d to waste of alot of governments fund. Therefore government should also devlope some reg...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nclear result it will somehow will help in future. this will only allow to save some fund...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...lt it will somehow will help in future. this will only allow to save some fund which...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... help to fund some other researches. in essance, i strongly disagree with the ...
^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ches. in essance, i strongly disagree with the statement that Government shou...
^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rongly disagree with the statement that Government should not fund research whos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33650793651 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81894394204 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5973906632 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.818181818 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490671890276 0.243740707755 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196095553448 0.0831039109588 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184257761869 0.0758088955206 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343812440062 0.150359130593 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197364490971 0.0667264976115 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.