Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should

Essay topics:

Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Government research encounter high expectation because of the foundation of those fundings. Nevertheless, it would be incoherent to support research with promising results since contemporary science and technology are so advanced that nothing will ensure good results. Furthermore, the utilization of a technology may take time from the discovery.

Admittedly, government research projects are subsidized by taxes and the public will be infuriated if their money is being used on preposterous findings. Moreover, the government's obligation to support their people's amenities and a good living could be met by pertinent investigation in promising disciplines such as pharmaceuticals. For instance, governments worldwide are providing financial support to biological and chemical institutions to facilitate discoveries of potential drugs: the NHU in Korea for example is given 10million dollars every year to find a cure for liver cancer. Consequently, the government by helping industries that seem to give myopic returns, will be able to help their citizens.

On the other hand, science today has been developed to a extent that no such discipline promises a good return. As studies get profound and intricate, not even the most prominent minds of the time can expect the outcomes of a experiment, which by the way, is infeasible without financial support. Therefore, to discriminate between areas that seem auspicious, and ominous is itself contradictory: even the biological departments are confounded by result that subvert their knowledge. Consequently, if the government has excess budgets to expense on science and technology, they should do it regardless of the expected results because any experiment will be a lottery.

Furthermore, a finding that seems useless can prove to be ever more helpful in the future. Einstein's special relativity for example, which predicted the exchange of mass and energy raise countless skepticism and was even considered as chicanery. However, after time passed we are all benefiting from his theory by atomic generators. Similarly the development of electric cars by the GM and Edison corporation was flout by the public around the world. However, their replacement of traditional cars seem imminent due to the sustainability it can bring to the quickly deteriorating environment. Hence, a true value of a innovation may take time to recognize.

In conclusion, although the public may be sensitive to funding seemingly irrelevant devices, the government should sometimes invest on those speculative parts of the industry because of the potential it may possess.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...on preposterous findings. Moreover, the governments obligation to support their peoples ame...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 56, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd, science today has been developed to a extent that no such discipline promises...
^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... of the time can expect the outcomes of a experiment, which by the way, is infeas...
^
Line 13, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...g from his theory by atomic generators. Similarly the development of electric cars by the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 414, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'flouted'.
Suggestion: flouted
...rs by the GM and Edison corporation was flout by the public around the world. However...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 617, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ing environment. Hence, a true value of a innovation may take time to recognize. ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, by the way, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64810126582 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24456233505 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584810126582 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8769090703 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.944444444 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.21951772744 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108053183741 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319093561214 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234067789897 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614440170747 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144162662376 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.