Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Monitoring and surveillance conducted across the organisation is a factor that every organisation relies on. For better maintaining, the statistics of dealings, a organisation maintains over the years. The routine check of the employee e-mail and the correspondence is essential to maintain the check and insights of all transactions every employee does. The very monitored data can be used to protect and estimate the system resources and capabilities efficiently. I strongly support the argument that the routine monitoring of employees should be done for system capacity estimates and protection of any lawsuits for the following two reasons.
To begin, by the statistical data based on the routine monitoring we can precisely estimate the resources and system capacity to deal with the deficit or the superfluous requirements. For instance, a entity with an intention to expand the business abroad, can reliably estimate the resources and the system capacities, so that, the required investment can be precisely estimated. Also, the system malfunction or the over-consumption of resources can be easily sensed and required actions can be taken to deal with the problem. The above example illustrates the importance of routine monitoring and the decision can be taken to particularly access the problems and requirements.
Secondly, the monitoring activities are very much essential these days to beep-up the security as any system is vulnerable to the any outside/inside attacks that includes spoofing, collusion and hacking he system. For example, recently Microsoft was able to identity the flaws and the vulnerability in their operating system of Win 7 just by routine monitoring the system under different circumstances. This example proves that the routine monitoring is the essential part of the organisation to deal with cyber threats.
Some may argue that routine monitoring the employee requires additional resources and serves no purpose but an overhead. however, the loss we incur if we do not do the routine monitoring in 10 folds more than doing the monitoring. Lawsuits , cyber attacks , under performed system can eat your resources slowly and soon at large affordable. Therefore, monitoring is the essential activity of a organisation to keep up with all the threats and estimating the resources efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... healthy meals to students but students werent attracted to these healthy food as they...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: We
...he strengths and weaknesses of argument.We need to know about the quality of food ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, really, so, then, thus, after all, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.9520958084 162% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 2260.96107784 103% => OK
No of words: 492.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7256097561 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38945824569 2.78398813304 86% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412601626016 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 705.55239521 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6461249129 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0357142857 119.503703932 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.20758483034 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0620667688822 0.218282227539 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236374228784 0.0743258471296 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247059621285 0.0701772020484 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.038748468172 0.128457276422 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207209508092 0.0628817314937 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.3799401198 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.3550499002 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.32208582834 86% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.