Competition for High Grades Seriously Limits The Quality of Learning at All Levels of Education
Knowledge is consumed differently by every individual. We can not appropriately measure every one’s ability in a single or standardized manner. Hence the grades which are used as the metric to measure one’s potential have become more important in the present day. The grands have gained such prominence that sometimes it’s okay if a student can achieve a good grade even if they are unable to apply or related the subjects they are studying. This doesn’t mean that every one attain good grades do not have enough potential, it’s the competition that’s deteriorating the quality of education.
Less than 1/5th of the people or organizations actually consider all the aspects of a student’s progress to deem a certain university or a college is good. Most of the times the deciding factor usually would be the the percentage of students who have achieved higher grades in a particular college. Even for a job interview the initial screening process itself involves filtering of the candidates based on their grades. This doesn’t even give the individual a chance to even prove themselves.
Due to these higher expectations from everyone around it is common for students to take pressure in achieving higher grades. It is because of the pressure they tend loose track of the sole purpose of why they are even studying in first place. Most of them do not even think they should be learning the subjects to apply them in real life rather than just to learn them to get a better grade in exam.
The society around has also created a false sense of achievement that only better grades mean successful individuals. To fulfill these expectations and to be the so called ideal or successful student, the main focus would be just to get a better a grade. Because of this the true purpose of education which is to gain and acquire knowledge is somewhere lost in the woods.
The understanding of the people has to change and synonymously the way to estimate one’s ability must be more holistic and comprehensive so that students actually focus on being better and improve the quality of knowledge they absorb rather than sweating out for better grades. I’d like to conclude by saying only when a true freedom is given to fail anyone can actually aspire to learn and succeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ity in a single or standardized manner. Hence the grades which are used as the metric...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...es the deciding factor usually would be the the percentage of students who have achieve...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...es the deciding factor usually would be the the percentage of students who have achieve...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 206, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...called ideal or successful student, the main focus would be just to get a better a grade. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 320, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'true freedom'.
Suggestion: true freedom
...’d like to conclude by saying only when a true freedom is given to fail anyone can actually as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93281653747 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71611014227 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521963824289 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2490273787 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.294117647 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52941176471 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130640183041 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380529899554 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302698605654 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069734295064 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00769160186473 0.0667264976115 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.