Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Critical judgement is different from professional knowledge, and actually it means the ability to think from one's own position and make a judgement for a certain topic or scenario. Therefore, I disagree with the statement and would argue that the increase of critical judgement from majority rather than just experts actually create more value.
First, in lots of real world scenarios, experts are not the same group of people who deal with or suffer from the problem directly. Therefore, if only involving the critical judgements from the experts, numerous of valuable considerations will be dismissed and further hinder the ultimate goal. For example, when designing the female restrooms, it is common to include the judgement of architectures. However, most of the architectures are male, so they are not familiar with the usage of female bathrooms and tend to design the restrooms that are not useful or practical. But, if the insight from female users are involved, such as the distance, the quantity or even the color, then the final design can be applied much better. This example illustrates perfectly that the different value can be achieved from including the critical judgements from real users.
Second, now we are in an age with overwhelming information, and it is crucial to possess the critical judgement ability to distinguish the quality of the information, so that we are not fooled by the wrong info. For instance, during the spread of infectious disease, numerous of rumors may be everywhere, and only the critical judgement from everyone can stop the rumors. This value can't be accomplished by the experts, who are normally the minority in the society. This phenomonan actually demonstrates the power of critical judgement from everyone.
Third, democracy is based on the belief that people can choose the best for themselves, which means people actually have the critical judgement ability to make decision from their own position. By deploying democracy, the government leverage everyone's critical judgement in the major issues. Therefore, if the value of critical judgement only brought from the experts, then the democracy will not be possible.
In conclusion, I believe the critical judgement from everyone will ultimately bring higher value then experts'-only critical judgement. Because users are normally know more than the experts in real world scenarios, and collective judgement with critical thinking is the vital way to stop wrong information. Final, the democracy is based on the premise of everyone's own free will which again illustrates the importance of critical judgement from each person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...veryone can stop the rumors. This value cant be accomplished by the experts, who are...
^^^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...l judgement. Because users are normally know more than the experts in real world sce...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36144578313 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84657161373 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477108433735 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7571824001 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.611111111 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143443175465 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579004740478 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289594554495 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989484598715 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128913466452 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.