Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Critical analysis of a topic means an in-depth analysis of the underlying issue which includes risk management, resource management etc. Without any prior knowledge of the subject, passing a judgment might be fallacious. One needs to understand different aspects of the field but it is not necessary to be an "expert" in that field. This arises a burning question, who is an expert?
An expert might be stated as a professional whose work is highly regarded. Becoming an expert in a field might take ages of practice, theoretical and practical knowledge of the field. But a person who understands the basic principles and working of the field can provide various insights regarding the issue at hand. One necessarily doesn’t need a degree to prove their understanding of the topic. Elon Musk, for example, is a multi-millionaire businessman and is knowledgeable. With his business in different ventures such as the automobile industry, aeronautical science, networking etc. can be considered as an expert in these fields. But knowing all the principles of the various fields doesn't make him an expert rather it is his critical thinking, reasoning and thirst for knowledge that makes him wise.
A person without the knowledge of a field might interpret a topic in a different method which might be unheard of and might lead to a better solution. One could argue that an expert might always provide a good solution or an efficient method to solve an issue. But it is a bona fide that exploring different possibilities and understanding its result, aids one to understand a topic better rather than choosing an already visited path.
Critical judgment can be comprehended with various techniques that could help one to analyze the work of a field. These include tasks such as resource management, risk management, time management, understanding the factors affecting the result and the application of the work in the real world scenario. This is just a set of various exhausting tasks that is necessary for critically analyzing a work. Most of these theoretical tasks need an understanding of the field but tasks such as time management and application of the work can be analyzed by any bystander with the basic knowledge of these topics.
To conclude, expertise in any field might help one to provide an optimal path or a solution. But to understand a topic better one needs to undergo the system of trial and error, understanding different possibilities and results. Hence, the analysis could be provided by a person having a fundamental knowledge of the field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 691, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ll the principles of the various fields doesnt make him an expert rather it is his cri...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10900473934 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11416964926 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431279620853 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2912453451 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.31818181818 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199902001861 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707870849896 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461544978766 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129566692769 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423182405959 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.