Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Each academic institution has a great responsibility to provide assistance and guideness to the students. Some prominent experts on the realn of education assert that educational unit should have the mechanisms to detect the weaknesses of students and discourage them to select a field of study which is out of their capabilities. On the other hand, a wide portion of academic personnel contend that the role of academic institutions is to provide assitance to students and to support them to fullfill their dreams. It is my personal belief that educational institutions should not dissuade student from selecting fields of study in which have limited possibilities to succeed as the desire of everyone to fulfill sis/her dreams is a more powerful motivator than the real capabilities.
Every student who is enrolled in an academic insitution start his/her effort with a great enthusiasm to gain all the necessary knowledge in order to graduate and fulfill his/her dream. All tasks ad dreams can be achieved as the desire, the patience, and the insistence are more strong motivator powers than the real capabilities. In addition, it is a usual phenomenon that teachers and professors can not provide an accurate evaluation of the actual skills of students as they can not detect their real abilities behind the usual unmature attitude of students. For instance, the teacher of Albert Einstein deemed him a very bad student with no capabilities to pursue a career on the realm of science, neverthless it is proved that this unskilled student to be one of the greatest minds in the history of mankind.
Moreover, the actual role of academic institutions is to assist their students and to operate a mean to fulfill their tasks and not to be an obstacle foe them. Each student can be antagonistic in every field of science with rigorous work and of course right guiideness from the university. For example, the Unooversity of Athens provide with
In conclusion, the educational institutions are responsible to evaluate their students and provide them with analytical informations about their capabilities and potential fields of study which are compatible with their skills,yet they should mainly support and assist their students to follow their dreams providing them all the necessary means.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , yet
...y which are compatible with their skills,yet they should mainly support and assist t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21680216802 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96280459841 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474254742547 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2077124137 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 118.986275619 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5454545455 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 5.21951772744 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221289595709 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876784928806 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705597458235 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14468178605 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746726697908 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.