Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
According to the author, educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of the study in which they are unlikely to succeed. The topic is debatable, so, different people may have different prospective over this kind of debatable topic. Whereas, I am disagree with the claim of the author that educational institution have a responsibility to dissuade the students from the fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. Rather than this, in my prospective educational institution should motivate the study to work hard in the field of interest of the students.
Firstly, educational institution have the great role and importance in guiding the students to meet their aim and make them capable of struggling in the present world situation. Whereas, the educational institution should not dissuade the students from any field without knowing the feeling or prospective of the students; because the students cannot get more concentrated and success in the field out of their interests. So, first responsibility of the every educational institution is to make the proper analysis of the interest of the students over different fields.
Secondly, the educational institute generally try to dissuade the students in comparison to their marks obtained in different educational levels; but this is absolutely wrong trend to udge the student through their grade, percentage obtained or percentile. Because the talent and ability of the student are not soley determined by the marks obtained by the students at different level of their studying carrier. There are large number of the stories we have heard that people are getting successful in there field of the interest after they have been considered unsuitable of that field. In the university where I have completed my education, there was one guy who have the keen interest in the field of research of different agronomical crops. But due to his lower grade in the exam taken by the university he havenot get any opportunity to get involved in the research through the department, but as the time passed that guy work hard for the long period and started the research to carried out alone. Finally the finding from the research make the department professor astounded. So, the trend bywhichstudent are generally dissuaded from the field of there interest is not the good pattern because every student have the capacity to study any subject.
In sum, the educational institution should motivate and encourage the student to pursue their goals in there interest of subject rather than dissuading them from the field in the sense that they will not get success on it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tive over this kind of debatable topic. Whereas, I am disagree with the claim of the au...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
... kind of debatable topic. Whereas, I am disagree with the claim of the author that educa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1005, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...rted the research to carried out alone. Finally the finding from the research make the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20930232558 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89259325302 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427906976744 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7208205886 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.563511535993 0.243740707755 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228732857031 0.0831039109588 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.231899522866 0.0758088955206 306% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385294999387 0.150359130593 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167392885555 0.0667264976115 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.